What do the Ukraine, 'Israel', South Korea, and Taiwan have in common? They are all governed by the same devilish equation. Divide and conquer. As Vladimir Putin said, "The formula they apply has been known from time immemorial – divide and rule. There is nothing new here." Or as Nasrallah said, "it ['Israel'] was established for the express purpose of dividing and partitioning the Muslim world." Or as Kim Il-Sung said, "U.S. imperialism’s basic strategy for world aggression at the present stage is to destroy the small and divided revolutionary socialist countries." Or as Mao said to the Palestinians, putting it all together, "You are the front gate, and we are the rear. They created Israel for you and Formosa [Taiwan] for us." 

This tactic has been known since time immemorial, as Putin said, but damned if it don't still work a devil's charm. If you sow division inside a city (or a world), then they'll open the gates for you, sometimes without firing a shot. It doesn't even take much of the population, just a few dumb, devious, or naive enough. The Trojan Horse metaphor is apt because this is indeed how 'Greek' democracy works under the White Empire. Democracy™ is a system they know how precisely to corrupt (they themselves have legalized corruption) and if you bring it inside your nation, bankers and CIA agents and soldiers pile out. You're in debt and occupied before you know it and if you dare elect someone they don't like, they'll rig the election, wreck your economy, and lawfare or warfare them out. It really is a foolproof system. It's fooled people over and over and the proof is in the pudding. Almost the whole world got cooked, except for the people they're attacking now. Those they call 'authoritarians', meaning just that they claim sovereignity outside the Empire. That's what the widely propagandized drama of 'democracies vs. authoritarians' means in the real world. It's anyone claiming their own authority vs. a demos driven crazy from without. And if you're wondering where you are, if you're not actively fighting the White Empire, you're in it. Good luck.

They reap what they sow, and the White Empire cultivates dissidents and activists and religious fundamentalists and entire breakaway provinces or states if it can get them. Hence in Ukraine they USAID Sorosified liberals, doing it for the 'democracy', and CIA neo-Nazis, doing it for the White Fuhrer (an actual person). In Palestine, they used Zionists—once a fringe within the Jewish population—to corrupt the Jews in general and frack an entire region. They'll use corrupted takfiri groups like ISIS or the Wahabbis in Saudi Arabia too. They're largely agnostic, any traitor will do. In South Korea they used oligarchs and a military dictatorship and in Taiwan they use the breakaway losers of a civil war. It's the same formula. Add shit, and stir.

It's important to understand all of these 'conflicts' as civil wars fomented from without. Ukrainians—including Zelensky—speak or understand Russian and were one people with Russians. They're naturally connected to Russia, as is Europe, but this 'America' (10,000 km away) does not want, so here we are. 'American' foreign policy has been on autocratic autopilot since the 1980s and it's unclear if they know the USSR has fallen. They're still trying to foment civil war within the USSR and now they've got what they wished for. They'll happy to fight to the last Ukrainian. Who cares about a little Slavic civil war? Certainly not the Nazis that won.

Take Palestine, also, as the White Empire did. Jews lived peacefully in the Muslim World (unlike in Europe) until Palestine was turned into a Jewish ghetto to dump European Jewry. It's well established that Europe didn't want to give them their homes back and 'America' didn't want them either, so they used their own mythology to get the Jews to deport themselves, and volunteer their grandchildren as conscripts in the imperial army. This is not to absolve the Jews, but to condemn the White Empire entire. Some Jews were native to the region, but from that foothold they were used to divide (multiply) and conquer an entire region.

Then take South Korea, as the Empire did, or Afghanistan or Vietnam where they tried. They setup puppet governments in all these places, which didn't even have to be 'democracies'. South Korea was a brutal military dictatorship for many years, until people protesting (and dying) got them this current fig-leaf democracy, where almost every President ends up in jail because the society is so corrupt and their military is under the command of foreigners. Korea is the most obviously divided and conquered. It's cut in half and the 'American' imperialists use the southern part as a conscript colony.

Finally, take Taiwan, as the KMT did after a Chinese civil war, which is still going on until the whole is reunited. Both China and Taiwan claim to be China and both are populated by people that consider themselves Chinese. Reunification would be much easier if 'America' wasn't trying to keep them divided.

All these divisions are not coincidences. They are not unrelated local problems, they are an intentional, international strategy. This is the White Empire in action, or more specifically, inaction. 'America' is the most indirect incarnation of the beast, but even the British and Dutch used local squabbles to cobble an international empire together. As Shakespeare said, "From ancient grudge break to new mutiny, Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean." If people are fighting amongst themselves, they're not fighting them. If you feed different factions with petty privileges (Nobel prizes, titles, book contracts, celebrity) and other factions with raw weapons, you can get entire populations to throw themselves at their neighbors, or even their family.

It's important to understand that none of these 'conflicts' would be happening without imperial meddling. We live under one White Empire and World War II never ended for most of us, what they call the Cold War was, for us, just World War Too, and what they call the War On Terror was World War III and is still going hot and heavy. None of the people I listed would be fighting each other naturally, without someone thousands of kilometers away pitting brother against brother for their own benefit. It is simply common sense to not fight with a larger neighbor, unless you think you have someone even larger behind you. And you don't even need a majority of the population to think this way, just a fraction willing to betray the other for petty privilege, or just to get one over on their local enemy.

You can see this in Ukraine, which should have and did have decent relations with its giant neighbor until distant 'America' intervened. Ukraine had a Russia-friendly government and even Zelensky said, in 2014, that "Russia and Ukraine really are brotherly nations." He was Russian speaking. But that Ukrainian government was couped and the corrupt comedian began persecuting Russian speakers and banning political parties and religions and so on, before throwing the entire male population into a meat-grinder and cancelling elections in a bloodbath of corruption. It makes no sense for Ukraine to be fighting Russia, and it made sense for them to take a deal in 2022 when it was offered, but because the country has been lobotomized by foreign interests, it keeps lumbering forward. They have been divided from their natural instinct for self-preservation and conquered, not by Russia, but by the White Empire.

You can see it in Palestine, also, where Jews were given refuge by Muslims from European predation, but their desire to be Europeans made them worse than Nazis in the end. It makes no sense for such a minority population to anger everyone in the neighborhood, but with White Empire behind them, that's how they're behaving. It's the same for South Korea, which is literally split along family lines and which really does not want to be divided in half, or for Taiwan, which is deeply integrated with the mainland. None of these conflicts would be happening without the White Empire fomenting them, while pretending it's 'just helping'. Helping themselves, more like it.

The benefit of divide and conquer is that you don't actually have to conquer much. You get other conquered people to do the fighting for you. You get them to fight each other, and they're not fighting you. All you have to do is give a narrow class of hyenas some scraps and you can take the lion's mass. And if you let a certain class use your weapons against their enemies (usually the masses), they'll line up to betray each other, for petty advantage. This worked since time immemorial, as Putin said, but now it isn't working because of people like him, like Nasrallah, like the Kims, or like the CPC. Who are refusing division and conquering the White Empire instead. All White Wars have division and conquest in common. But there is increasingly common cause in uniting and defeating them.