My daughter is (mildly) sick and home from school. This hurts because I know that so many children are sick to death and being bombed in the ruins of their schools. This targeting of civilians is the plan, and the 'Israelis' are quite open about it. There's more cover-up in the Western press than the 'Israeli', which is quite openly genocidal and proud of it.

Massacres have been the 'Israeli' strategy after their strategic defeat on October 7th (shout-out Hamas and all the Resistance). 'Israel's' stated and demonstrated plan has been to kill everyone, bomb everything and avoid Hamas as much as possible, because those men are actually brave and the IOF literally shits itself and runs in real combat. This calculated cowardice is what 'Israel' calls the 'General's Plan', which retired Major General Giora Eiland expressed in November 2023.

In 'Israeli' publication Yediot Ahronot, which again is less censored than the West, Eiland said (translated),

Who are the “poor” women of Gaza? They are all the mothers, sisters or wives of Hamas murderers. On the one hand, they are part of the infrastructure that supports the organization, and on the other hand, if they experience a humanitarian disaster, then it can be assumed that some of the Hamas fighters and the more junior commanders will begin to understand that the war is futile and that it is better to prevent irreversible harm to their families.

The way to win the war faster and at a lower cost for us requires a system collapse on the other side and not the mere killing of more Hamas fighters. The international community warns us of a humanitarian disaster in Gaza and of severe epidemics. We must not shy away from this, as difficult as that may be. After all, severe epidemics in the south of the Gaza Strip will bring victory closer and reduce casualties among IDF soldiers. And no, this is not about cruelty for cruelty’s sake, since we don’t support the suffering of the other side as a goal but as a means.

This is not a new strategy. Indeed, 'Israeli' lost on October 7th and they're now just delivery boys for American bombs and American ideology. This strategy is, in fact, what America calls 'strategic bombing,' despite it being just bombing. America developed this idea after World War II, when they started believing their own propaganda, that they had won World War II and that it wasn't the honorable sacrifice of millions of Soviets and Chinese. Robert McNamara was one of the self-admitted war criminals behind ‘strategic bombing’ and he said (in the documentary Fog Of War),

I was on the island of Guam in his [General Curtis LeMay's] command in March of 1945. In that single night, we burned to death 100,000 Japanese civilians in Tokyo men, women, and children in order to win a war. Should you kill 100,000 people in one night by firebombing or any other way? LeMay's answer would be clearly yes. ‘McNamara, do you mean to say that instead of killing 100,000, burning to death 100,000 Japanese civilians in that one night we should have burned to death a lesser number or none and then had our soldiers cross the beaches in Tokyo and been slaughtered in the tens of thousands? Is that what you're proposing? Is that moral, is that wise? ’

Why was it necessary to drop the nuclear bomb if LeMay was burning up Japan and he went on from from Tokyo to firebomb other cities. 58% of Yokohama. Yokohama is roughly the size of Cleveland. 58% of Cleveland destroyed. Tokyo is roughly the size of New York, 51% of New York destroyed. 99% of the equivalent of Chattanooga which was Toyama. 40% of the equivalent of Los Angela which was Nagoya. This was all done before the dropping of the nuclear bomb.

LeMay said if we'd lost the war we'd all have been prosecuted as war criminals and I think he's right. He and I'd say I were behaving as war criminals. LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side had lost but what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win?

What McNamara got wrong, in addition to morality, was causality. America did not win the World War II at all, they just played spoiler. The USSR and China engaged and destroyed most of the Axis troops, while the Americans killed mostly civilians and held back to collect the spoils of White Empire. America swooped in at the end took the movie rights and started believing the stories they told about themselves, and the lies they told about the communists. The tragedy is not just that American war criminals were not prosecuted, it's that they still prosecute war this way. America fooled itself that their inhumanity won World War II and not the human sacrifice of much better men.

In this way, the ‘General's Plan’ in 'Israel' is no different from the general plan of American Empire. That's why I call it one White Empire, genocide and collective punishment is a long European tradition. Scorched earth is how America stole America, how they fought against themselves in the Civil War (with Sherman's March to the Sea), how they fought in World War II, and how they've warred against the world ever since. Scorched earth is what they leave of the entire climate, in the end. This is the general plan of genocide, and it's not unique to occupied Palestine. This is how they've occupied the world, and in resisting this attack on so many children, we are all Palestinian.