NATO fighting over the North is good for South. I'm all for some White-on-White violence. Less for us. Whether Greenland is part of Denmark which rents it to America or owned by America outright is irrelevant. It's occupied no matter what. Remember that it's all one White Empire. Canada and Denmark are not real countries, as they're now finding out. What we're seeing is an invisible empire becoming visible, which is helpful. The White Empire hides behind false flags and is exposed by Trump's naked aggression. Trump is an honest thief, revealing that there's no honor amongst thieves. If he takes Greenland and splits NATO in half, good for us.

Remember that Hitler was a great force for decolonization by wrecking Europe. All Hitler did was apply European colonial procedures to Europe (as Césaire said), which they can't forgive him for, but they've forgiven themselves sure enough. And they don't deserve it. They're still commiting genocide, these violent tribes of Europe. France, Britain, Belgium, and all those little twerps did and continued to do worse than the Nazis. They just did it to colored people, so it doesn't count, and they didn't do it to Jews, so there aren't a million movies about it. The movies make World War II look like good vs. evil, but it was all bad guys on the Western Front. France, England, America? All historical villains.

World War II benefited the Global South because our occupiers were giving each other black eyes back home. Decolonization was accelerated by the total cannibalization of Europe, though not enough. Self-defeated in Europe, the White Empire ‘retreated to the new world’ as Churchill said it in his ‘We Are Now America's Bitches’ speech. America took up the white man's burden ‘after’ World War II, re-employed Nazis, deported the Jews to 'Israel' as conscripts, and let the European colonizer mostly keep their colonies. Denmark —unable to hold onto Denmark for more than six hours—somehow kept Greenland because nobody bothered. Now Trump is talking about taking Greenland, and I say, what's the difference? This is like watching horse thieves fight over horses. Keeps them from riding on us.

I have no sympathy for Denmark because they suck. As Denmark's unironically moronic Ambassador said, “The Kingdom of Denmark has always stood shoulder-to-shoulder w [the USA]. After 9/11, Denmark answered the US' call. We lost more soldiers in Afghanistan per capita than any other @NATO ally.” He's seriously saying ‘because we helped you invade Afghanistan, don't invade us’. This is the wolf crying wolf, except it's really a stuffed animal.

There's no anti-imperialism in sight here, this is just an inter-imperial squabble. Europeans have been squabbling over their colonies since they had colonies, we bear the scars of it in Sri Lanka. This fight is not about the natives of Greenland, they're occupied either way. Either Denmark ‘lets’ America put guns there or America lets themselves. To a planet facing the loaded gun, what's the difference? This is why I'm all for some inter-colonial violence. It's bad for colonialism.

Trump understands this in a way Euro-peons (who believe their own bullshit) do not. Hence as Trump writes in his hilarious letter to the nattering nabob of Norway,

Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also.

I actually appreciate someone framing colonialism as it is. Transparently evil and stupid. Cometh the hour, cometh the man, and Trump is the man for this moment, tragedy repeating as farce all over again. Trump says the quiet parts out loud, and he's not wrong about how they're wrong. In his deep historical idiocy, Trump understands the deep id of America unconsciously. As the Notorious BIG told me, fuck bitches, get money. Euro-peons are just America's bitches, as they're finding out imminently.

Trump understands the deep historical need of White Empire, which is imperialism and also constant squabbling over it. Trump channels the deep id of America in his deep idiocy. As he says, quite honestly,

David E. Sanger: Why is ownership important here?

Trump: That's what I feel is psychologically needed for success. I think that ownership gives you a thing that you can't do, whether you're talking about a lease or a treaty. Ownership gives you things and elements that you can't get from just signing a document, that you can have a base.

Katie Rogers: Psychologically important to you or to the United States?
President Trump: Psychologically important for me. Now, maybe another president would feel differently, but so far I've been right about everything.

Trump understands the JD of the US Presidency more clearly that over-educated people, who believe their own hypocrisy. I grew up in the Heart of America™ and we learned about the Louisiana Purchase, Alaska Purchase, and other fencing of stolen goods as very good things. We played Oregon Trail as if spreading the colonial cancer coast-to-coast was good fun. Trump is not dumb in this sense. This is grade-school American education.

America emerged out of Europeans fighting over land that wasn't theirs and the fact that they briefly stopped fighting is the anomaly, not Trump. Washington was a land thief that even stole the teeth in his mouth. Jefferson fenced stolen land from Napoleon and enslaved his own children. Roosevelt colonized and killed natives personally. Abraham Lincoln presided over the largest mass execution of Natives in 'American' history and only ‘freed’ the slaves after they ‘belonged’ to his enemies. White people doing crime and fighting over it is as old as White People. Trump understands this instinctively.

Trump will get in the history books and rocky nooks if he makes America the second biggest country in the world, which cannibalizing Greenland would do. Might as well take Canada too, and go for number one. This will be a brief footnote as the United States of America itself collapses by 2030 (mark my words). And remember I'm not cheering for the further occupation of that land, but jeering at the insufferable Euro-peons acting like they represent freedom. But as the Prince of Denmark, Hamlet said, “Denmark's a prison.” And as he continued, “Till then, sit still, my soul. Foul deeds will rise, Though all the earth o’erwhelm them, to men’s eyes.”