The liberal position is to support Muslim corpses but not their rockets. This is not a coherent position, but they’re sticking to their not-guns. But the Empire punishes them anyways. If they’re going to call you a terrorist anyways, might as well support Hamas. Join the club.

Francesca Albanese condemns Hamas and Iran—ie the people actually doing something—and for what? She gets personally sanctioned by the White Empire anyways. And Cenk Uygur says “I’m for a two state solution and I’m against all terrorists groups,” accepting both ‘Israel’ and their definition of terrorism, and gets punished for his troubles. He gets banned from the UK anyways (it’s all one White Empire, if you haven’t figured it out).

All of their pious platitudes, all of their fundamental loyalty to the Empire, it all comes to naught. These people cancel themselves out in history, and are cancelled in the present also. What’s the point of all this posturing? If you’re getting the punishment, might as well do the thought-crime. As Dostoevsky said, “Your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing.”

I understand that supporting the Resistance is currently illegal within the Empire. Hamas, Hezbollah, etc are proscribed organizations, so I can understand not supporting them openly. But at the same time, even if you try to dance around a fundamentally incoherent position, you get punished anyways. You get deplatformed, sanctioned, and travel-banned anyways. So, at this point, many years into an extermination campaign, why not show some courage? Or just shut up, and show some dignity.

I cannot stand these people condemning the Resistance, the only people who have stood up and paid in blood. This diet imperialism is a common position, which I think is repulsive to everyone. Condemning both the empire and the resistance appeals to no one. Such people offend the Jews and the Christian Zionists no matter what, and they offend free- -thinking people who can see what’s what.

These people should just keep the Resistance’s name out they mouths, or have some real courage and speak up. Break the seal on what is an unassailable position, which more and more people feel but aren’t saying. That the people blowing up tanks and attacking military bases are the good guys, and the bad guys are the ones blowing up hospitals and schools and censoring you for complaining about it. You might as well support Hamas, because they’re going to punish you anyways. Or just shut up.

I live in the most of the world where all these organizations banned by the people committing the genocide are not illegal. This limits my ability to travel, but that says more about those places than me. Looking at it objectively, this is not a remotely complicated situation. You’ve got a bunch of open child killers working for pedophiles in the White Empire, and the Axis of Resistance blowing up tanks and defending their land with very few civilian casualties. Hamas, Iran, Hezbollah, and Ansarallah are unequivocally the good guys in the World War III that’s going on (if you include colored people in the world). I mean, we’ve got a genocide, multiple invasions, and every country is affected; what else do you want to call it? And who do you think the good guys are, the people committing genocide and invading people, or the people resisting and defending their homes?

This time around, it isn’t even controversial. Past liberation movements have seen excesses: the killing of civilians, rape, torture, the ugly accoutrements of war. But these fighters have much more precise weapons and exceptional ideological discipline through Islam. The Axis of Resistance has used pinpoint missiles on military targets, treated prisoners of war well, and not raped anyone, despite their pediatricians being raped to death themselves.

Even the ‘civilian’ casualties of October 7th were mostly due to ‘Israel’ invoking the Hannibal Directive and killing its own people rather than letting Hamas achieve its goal, taking prisoners of war for an exchange with the thousands of Palestinians held in rape and torture prisons. What are we even talking about here, once you get out of the media bubble of people that protest for their right to rape and openly talk killing children? One side is blowing up hospitals and schools, while the other is blowing up tanks with their bare hands. This is not a complicated moral position. That’s why I wholeheartedly support the Resistance against such evil and will never ‘condemn Hamas.’

However, pious liberals always say this, as if to signal that they’re loyal opposition. Western ‘leftists’ (not a thing) quite vocally hem and haw. They’re quite happy talking about the suffering of Palestinians and the cruelty of the Empire, but someone actually doing something about it? That’s too far. It’s like a firefighter’s convention where no one is allowed to talk about water.

Again, as the saying goes, those who support our corpses and not our rockets are hypocrites and not of us. It is obvious to anyone that’s watched a movie that one should fight back against such great evil, but such great weasels dominate Western discourse that this becomes complexified into nothing. As Shakespeare said, the Western liberal, “struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.”

Take Nicholas Kristof’s piece, in the New York War Crimes, talking about well-documented rapes by the ‘Israeli’ military, during a time when they also raped people from all nations in the flotilla, just to rub it in. Kristof, however, opens his piece with the lynching lie that Hamas raped people at all. They didn’t! There is no physical evidence of this and no named victims, just like the 40 dead babies, but even people that bemoan ‘Israel’s’ excesses still spread its propaganda! And what does Kristof get for his both-sidesing of rape victims? Jews protest against him anyways, lol. There is no point to any of this. There is no point to any of these people. The Jews that protest to rape in ‘Israel’ are, in fact better, than the dumb goys that protest against it, because at least they’re being honest with themselves.

This intellectual dishonesty is endemic among American intellectuals. I tried to watch a debate with John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt vs. war ghouls Victoria Nuland and Mike Pompeo, and there actually is no debate. The war pigs (Nuland and Pomeo) are at least honest with their hate when they said, ‘do you think Iran is a monster?’ Stephen Walt has been trying to sound all reasonable, but even he has to throw Iran under the bus because they’re all loyal imperialists. Walt says, ‘I’m glad I don’t live there.’ What does that mean, Stephen?

The idea that a White man should want to live in other places is fundamentally colonial. How dare this useless man talk down on the one country in the world doing its duty under the genocide convention. The arrogance of all of these people. Both Imperialism and Diet Imperialism share the same fundamental disrespect towards every place on Earth, which is shared by everyone on that stage, regardless of their meaningless debate about how to do it. These are all useless people. These are all debates within White Empire.

And the funny thing is that the people trying to square the circle—to not support Empire, but to condemn its enemies, making themselves harmless—these people get cancelled anyways. Mearsheimer is isolated to podcasts and other countries for his trouble trying to save America from the ‘Israel Lobby,’ as if it isn’t one big corruption ouroboros. And I’ve never even heard of Stephen Walt. These men are punished by (relative) obscurity now and will be condemned or just ignored by history entirely.

This all reminds me of the story of Sun Wukong trying to jump out of the Buddha’s hand in Journey to the West. The dear Monkey King flew 10,000 leagues on a cloud, got out, saw some pillars marking the edge of the universe, and pissed on them to mark his territory. Then he flew back and demanded his boon from the Buddha. The Buddha just smiled and pointed to the piss pooled in his palm. The Monkey King had flailed about to get nowhere at all, and was buried under the five-finger mountain for thousands of years until he learned his lesson.

All of these debates within Empire while condemning the actual Resistance are like the arrogance of the Monkey King, without any of his redeeming characteristics. Such debaters searching for the magical center of Nazism will be condemned for their cowardice, or just ignored by history, which they have piously crossed themselves out of. Indeed, they have perfectly triangulated a position to piss everyone off, like classic liberals. They support the idea of resistance while condemning the people dying for it, and support the idea of imperialism, while condemning the people actually killing for it.

If you condemn ‘Israel’ and also Hamas, I guess you’re neutral, which means what? You’ve taken the side of the oppressor, you morons. You’re the loyal opposition within a White Empire when, as Noel Ignatiev said, “treason to Whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Even supposed ‘supporters’ like Francesca Albanese, Cenk Uygur, or Hasan Piker, still operate within imperial structures like the UN or Democratic Party, who are all in on it. At best they’ll say that ‘Israel’ is more evil than the Resistance, but this is nonsense. The Resistance is actually good.

These supposed ‘good guys’ are still fundamentally on team evil and are thus frauds. These people still deny selfhood and self-defense to non-White people and assert that liberation must be given by White lawyers and intellectuals, people who cannot even liberate their own minds. And the funny thing is, even after piously trying to signal their loyalty to empire, they get punished anyways. Might as well support Hamas.