Sarath Fonseka, crossing a river I think.
The Mahavamsa (a history of Sri Lanka) is full of conflicts between generals and kings. Usually, the more bloodthirsty and unscrupulous would win. Our current (elected) ruler Mahinda Rajapaksa has had his own general conflicts, namely with one Sarath Fonseka. In the old days Fonseka would have staged a coup, as in literally try to cut of Mahinda’s head, and Mahinda would – if that failed – tie him to four elephants and split his parts asunder. Can’t do that shit anymore. Instead Fonseka ran for office and lost and Mahinda tossed him in jail.
Nowadays there are pressures on leaders to not behave like brutes, and Sri Lankan power, in general, transitions peacefully. At various points the Bandaranaike and Jayawardena families have had near absolute power which was not nearly as absolute as they thought. Premadasa is one counter example that ended with a bomb, but even he served at the mercy of significant democratic pressure. All this is good, and it’s why neither Fonseka nor Mahinda is dead and why the country is not a mess. This is how such conflicts used to go down:
Thereupon the powerful general Kitti had the eyes of this king put out, deposed him and had the government carried on for three years without mishap by Lilavati, the first mahesi of the sovereign Parakkamabahu.
Thereupon King Sahasamalla of the race of Okkaka, a lion in courage, carried on the government for two years. Then having deposed this Monarch, the general Ayasmanta, a man of almost unsurpassable courage, a supporter of his royal family, prudently had the government carried on with wise policy for six months by Kalyanavati, the first mahesi of Kittinissanka…
Thereupon there reigned for one year a royal prince Dhammasoka by name, who on coming to the throne was aged three months. The Mahadipada Anikanga came at the head of a great army from the Cola kingdom, slew the ruler in Pulatthinagara, Prince Dhammasoka, together with the general Ayasmanta and reigned seventeen days. But the general, Vikkantacamunakka, the villain, slew the Monarch Anikanga and had the government carried on for a year by the first consort of King Parakkamahihu, Lilavati by name, who had already reigned before.
Now came King Lokissara by name, who had been wounded in the shoulder by a spear, with a great Damila army from the opposite shore, brought the whole of Lanka under his sway and reigned, dwelling in Pulatthinagara, nine months. Hereupon the general Parakkama, the best among men of decision, endowed with great power and courage, belonging to the family of the Kalanagaras, consecrated the Mahesi Lilavati who came of the dynasty of the Sun and Moon, in the royal dignity, she who afterward shone in royal splendor. When then a space of about seven months had passed for the Mahesi, there landed with a great Pandu army from the Pandu kingdom the glorious Pandu King Parakkama, deposed the Queen and her general Parakkama and after he had cleared Lanka from the briers (of revolt), he ruled the realm in superb Pulatthinagara for three years, without transgressing the political precepts of Manu. (The Sixteen Kings, Culavamsa I think).
Power is not so unstable now, which is a good thing, because such jockeying only really happens in an extractive economy where average people are getting screwed and the strong are fighting over who gets the spoils.
My only wonder is what the play is now. In the Mahavamsa, every general conflict proceeds towards the same inevitable conclusion – either him or me. Get power or die trying. What we have here is a novel situation where the General is out, but stripped of his rank, his Parliament seat, possibly his civil rights and with his only shot being democratic rather than force. Yet an election is four or five years in the future. There have been kings stupid enough to take Generals back into military service, or to let them escape, but I’ve never read a situation where the General was out but so hampered by invisible fetters.
Mahinda has presumably planned this so that Fonseka is locked up while he locked power down and then out before he dies in jail (he’s in poor health, what from losing much of his innards in the war). So now Fonseka is out and criticizing the government, but power has already been consolidated and he looks to be tied up in court cases for the rest of his life. But, as with any reading of the Mahavamsa, you never know. Power is more predictable than before, but it’s still not predictable. So I guess we’ll see.
“bloodthirsty and unscrupulous would win”
More cunning guy would win. Usually having blood thirst and being unscrupulous are not a guaranty for wining.
A truly cunning cold blooded guy would do things which are blood thirsty and unscrupulous but those things are not the ones which makes him a winner.
On the BBC video Sarath Fonseka reckons he doesn’t want to run for president but you can see the gleam in his eyes.
“jockeying only really happens in an extractive economy where average people are getting screwed and the strong are fighting over who gets the spoils” – that described the world’s economy as a whole.
More importantly, it is precisely what’s happening in SL right now.
Well yes..that’s a given.
One has to admire how Anoma Fonseka handled the whole thing.
Though MR probably released him after significant pressure from US, he would still hope the politically immature SF will shoot himself in the foot with some controversial speech in the near future. Opposition is too spilt and weak to join forces and SF likes to do tHings his way. He won’t go under a UNP umbrella. So chances are that MR took a safe bet with the release, unless of course two years behind bars has made SF wiser and more determined.
More correct to have said the Wijewardene, Ratwatte, Obeysekere families.
DBS Jeyaraj is highly critical of Sarath Fonseka:
http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/6596
well he has been always like that.
“Essarahata Jonny, Pitipassata Fonny” was first in his blog.
A character like The Last King of Scotland?
Amin (am thinking you are referring to him) was a nutter. Fonseka is much better.
Had he been elected he would have created order in the country compared to MR (but at a price which may be too high).
He could or would have been a dictator type (much worse than MR) but more closer to south Korean military dictatorship or the singaporean Lee (that actually developed the country) rather than to Idi Amin.
Well, it’s quite funny how the co-called “liberals” of Colombo were desperate for a Fonseka win in the last presidential election. Sri Lanka can never win the war they said, the Sri Lankan army is just winning jungle they said, the Sri Lankan army will be defeated and pushed back they said, and then after all that they ended up rooting for a General to lead the country… strange, strange fellows these ESE types.
It’s interesting to read your excerpt from the Culawamsa, especially the reference to Lilawati the “Mahesi” and how the various rulers allowed her to run the government…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilavati_of_Polonnaruwa