Rajapaksas Are Used To Getting What They Want, In This Case A Chief Justice

Mahinda Family Poster

Sign saying ‘outsiders are not allowed in’, at a kade in Kalutara.


The Rajapaksa family is used to getting what they want. The kids want to race cars or be astronauts so they get tax breaks and satellites. Mahinda wanted an airline so he got Mihin. Now Basil wants control over provincial level patronage and the Supreme Court was standing in the way. So the family wanted the Chief Justice removed. This, however, does not simply waste the people’s money, it’s a pretty direct violation of law and order. And, quite embarrassingly, the charges are quite patently dumb.

Any charges or Parliament papers are usually a paper cover over the ultimate fact that the Rajapaksas simply want something. The 18th Amendment was simply Mahinda wanting more power. The Fonseka prosecution was simply Mahinda wanting to be rid of someone who’d dared oppose him. In the latter case, however, Fonseka actually was a dodgy dude and the charges, while trumped up and often contradictory, were still believable. In the Shirani Bandaranayake case, however, they have nothing. Like, I thought they we have something on her, but they have absolutely nothing. It’s actually quite pathetic.

The broad charges are that she A) had money B) bought a house C) had bank accounts D) delivered a decision to the wrong ceremonial person E) wrote something in Groundviews (before it existed) and F) has a husband under investigation. I was reading through the charge sheet and it’s just dumb. They couldn’t even make up anything serious. As per her response, she seems to have just bought a house for her sister in Australia, had bank accounts and made some administrative decisions. The charges relating to her husband may be serious, but that’s still not legal grounds for impeaching her, nor do they make any case that it is.

As Bandaranayake’s lawyers said, “The document dated 14/11/2012 contains no charges in Law.” Seriously, there’s nothing there. Even by the broadest definition, there is no grounds for impeachment, and they haven’t even made a compelling story up. Literally, there’s nothing there.

All that’s really there underneath is that the Rajapaksas want her out, and the Rajapaksas usually get what they want. This faux impeachment, however, is really beyond the pale. It’s just patently dumb, and I pity the legal draftsmen who had to convert what a gossipy school note into some sort of coherent document, and failed. Of course, I have nothing but contempt for the MPs who signed this thing, seemingly without reading it, just to curry favor with the king.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

11 Comments »

2012-11-26 12:45:41

The picture is priceless.

 
Medamulana Ralahami
2012-11-26 14:24:26

Before Rajapaksha’s we had Nicolae Ceau?escu in Romania, Gadaffi in Libya, Saddham Husseinin Iraq and Suharto in Indonesia etc and you all know how they had to leave office and it will be months and days that Rajapaksha’s will be thrown into the dustbin.

A family controls 72% of the economy and a daylight robbery.

 
Gun Gun
2012-11-26 18:55:39

The sad thing is, if there is an election tomorrow, I suspect the govt. will still win. That is the state of our uneducated (m)asses and a lack of credible alternative.

 
max
2012-11-26 20:29:49

Maybe for his 75th birthday, they’ll officially rename the country as Sri Rajapaksa Lanka in recognition of the Family’s unprecedented contribution to our collective national well-being.
And this can be our new national anthem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vvg_rfGGnSk

 
2012-11-27 08:59:41

There are many nuances to this question that I had missed, most critically:

“There is a vital Constitutional issue on whether the Parliament can “hear” the charges against the Chief Justice. Can the Parliament be converted into a court to try an accused? As we know, it is the judiciary that can hear cases and not the parliament – whether it is against the President, judge of a court or any other. Please read carefully the following paragraph in the Constitution (Article 4(c) of the Constitution):

“the judicial power of the People shall be exercised by Parliament through Courts, tribunals, and institutions created and established, or recognized by the Constitution, or created and established by law, except in regard to matters relating to the privileges, immunities and powers of Parliament and of its Members, wherein judicial power of the People may be exercised directly by Parliament according to law.”

It is clear that the cases are to be decided by courts and institutions that have been established to adjudicate judicially. However, parliament can also do it in respect of ONE type of cases; i.e. matters relating to breach of Parliamentary privileges and Nothing Else. Impeachment inquiry of a judge is not one of them. And therefore, the Parliament cannot hear and determine on whether a judge is guilty of misconduct or not.”

Source:

http://lankaenews.rsf.org/English/newsc378.html?id=13160

It should be a tribunal of judges, people who are trained to evaluate evidence who must judge. In the Malaysian constitution it is a tribunal of judges including a selection from Commonwealth countries who must determine wrongdoing. Sri Lanka’s aborted constitution of 2000 also envisaged a tribunal drawn up of Commonwealth judges to determine guilt.

 
2012-11-28 12:54:33

At the rate we’re going the next generation might stage a revolution. Or not. Cause we’re Sri Lankan and allow things to happen.

I wonder if we had Oil, would we be puppets to the Americans or be bumped off for opposing.

 
2012-11-28 13:21:00

Ahamed,
Why be puppets of America when we can be puppets of China ?

 
2012-11-28 16:33:20

How much is the salary of the Chief Justice?

 
2012-11-29 09:29:43

Not sure, should be public but not sure how to find it. If you are wondering where the money came to buy the flats see the response here

http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/12690

 
2012-11-29 10:19:21

That’s a good response, and should be easily verifiable if true.

 
2012-11-30 12:42:57

True. China’s got a better grip on us.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


How The BBS Attacks (A Tale Of Two Cities) (6)

Jack Point: The BBS is tapping into resentments that are buried deep in the subconscious. What they do it to tap in to them, nurture them and magnify them. Exactly what 969 is doing. Exactly what the Nazi’s did. http://jestfork icks.blogsp...

shammi: But you do agree that not arresting G.A. Gnanasara and any other lawbreakers from both sides will only serve to deepen this mistrust? If you don’t, you must be living in said land.

Liberal One: I was talking about the distrust between Sinhalese and Muslims. If you think distrust between these two communities didn’t exist before Gnanasara thero entered the scene you must be living in the la la land of the Colombians.

Damian Poosa (2000-2014) (1)

greene: innalillahi wa inna ilaihi raajioon.

Buddhism And Racism (2)

Johan: Temples tend to be quite skilled at fund raising for building projects within temple premises; perhaps they could mobilise those skills to raise funds to rebuild the damage wrought in Aluthgama and Beruwela. If you go to a particular...

Nandasiri Wanninayaka: Nice to see you are blogging again.

What A Colombo Revolution Might Look Like (Thailand) (6)

Shirley Silva: Good analysis but you failed to mention that unlike in Bangkok a good shower would send the UNPs scuttling home. Above all there is a big leadership vacuum. No charismatic leader like in Thailand

sharanga: Good constructive criticism.

sharanga: >the electorate is too ill-informed to decide This is almost always true in any country. It’s one of the greatest faults of democracy. The electorate is ill-informed and as public choice theorists put it, systematica...

Anti Christian Christmas (2)

Jack Point: I found this video very disturbing. https://www.you tube.com/watch? v=EUHCQyxK3ps&a mp;feature=yout u.be http://dbsjeyar aj.com/dbsj/arc hives/27450

Damian Poosa (2000-2014)

Our family cat Damian passed away last night. He was an American cat and it was fitting that he passed on the Fourth Of July. Damian was an ornery cat made happy by the love and care of my sister and parents. I brought him home on the day of my high school graduation (a stunningly thoughtless thing, in hindsight) and my sister and mother actually raised him. He then travelled back to Sri Lanka and had a great time till he got old.

How The BBS Attacks (A Tale Of Two Cities)

This seems to be the basic BBS gameplan (for fucking up everything we’ve worked so hard to build after the war). It’s a cycle of outrage, riot, fear, repeat. It’s like the eightfold path to not being a Buddhist:

Buddhism And Racism

Buddhism is not racist. The ideas and practice of Buddhism involve meditation, perception of impermanence and ultimately what we would call a renunciation of self. Being a Buddhist, however, is not just that. Being a Buddhist fundamentally involves taking refuge in three things – the Buddha, the Dhamma (his teachings) and the Sangha (the community of practice). As a Buddhist, this is why the violence in Aluthgama is so troubling. Becomes it comes cloaked in the colors of the Sangha. The main racists and instigators of mob violence are monks.

The Tragedy In Aluthgama

I haven’t written here in a while because, well, I guess I haven’t had much to say. I’m been writing about food and leisure at YAMU but, well, somethings gotten in the way of that now. In a way we could sense it because of the constant halal debate on YAMU, which is mainly a food site. That food issue in many ways has become a touchstone for the Muslim/Buddhist tensions rising in this country. Yesterday those tensions seemed to explode in Aluthgama and Beruwela on the Western coast. The racist BBS staged a rally there and then paraded thru the streets. This exploded into violence, attacks on businesses and homes.