<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On The Gayness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indi.ca/2012/09/on-the-gayness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indi.ca/2012/09/on-the-gayness/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m a Sri Lankan blogger and hopeful entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:35:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://indi.ca/2012/09/on-the-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-267017</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indi.ca/?p=11751#comment-267017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are going to cite Matthew Vines video, I recommend you ensure you are aware of its many flaws. There are many critics of that video, eg as listed at the bottom of this page: http://stasisonline.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/homosexual-marriage/ ?

But just because Matthew Vines&#039; arguments are flawed does not mean that his most cold-hearted critics are right. The Christian god loves everyone, including homosexuals. In Christianity, it&#039;s not the person that is the sin, it&#039;s the gay sex. Likewise I question whether it&#039;s correct to claim that Matthew&#039;s fellow parishioners rejected him. The NYT article seems to be saying they rejected his arguments, rather than saying they rejected him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going to cite Matthew Vines video, I recommend you ensure you are aware of its many flaws. There are many critics of that video, eg as listed at the bottom of this page: <a href="http://stasisonline.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/homosexual-marriage/" rel="nofollow">http://stasisonline.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/homosexual-marriage/</a> ?</p>
<p>But just because Matthew Vines&#8217; arguments are flawed does not mean that his most cold-hearted critics are right. The Christian god loves everyone, including homosexuals. In Christianity, it&#8217;s not the person that is the sin, it&#8217;s the gay sex. Likewise I question whether it&#8217;s correct to claim that Matthew&#8217;s fellow parishioners rejected him. The NYT article seems to be saying they rejected his arguments, rather than saying they rejected him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Channa</title>
		<link>http://indi.ca/2012/09/on-the-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-264368</link>
		<dc:creator>Channa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indi.ca/?p=11751#comment-264368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks and I support you. 
Thanks for not bringing the &quot;born gay&quot; theory and the &quot;its natural&quot; logic to back your arguments. 

I was expecting some biased stuff. 

I think there should not be any laws regarding marriage. 

Also the gay community should accept that fact that some homosexuals do not want to embrace the gay identity. There are people who wants to change. They are often unrecognized and not supported. 

Cheers to you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks and I support you.<br />
Thanks for not bringing the &#8220;born gay&#8221; theory and the &#8220;its natural&#8221; logic to back your arguments. </p>
<p>I was expecting some biased stuff. </p>
<p>I think there should not be any laws regarding marriage. </p>
<p>Also the gay community should accept that fact that some homosexuals do not want to embrace the gay identity. There are people who wants to change. They are often unrecognized and not supported. </p>
<p>Cheers to you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sri Lanka: The Rights Of The Homosexuals And Tolerance &#183; Global Voices</title>
		<link>http://indi.ca/2012/09/on-the-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-264047</link>
		<dc:creator>Sri Lanka: The Rights Of The Homosexuals And Tolerance &#183; Global Voices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indi.ca/?p=11751#comment-264047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Indi.ca comments on the rights of the homosexuals:  Sri Lanka and India, despite our pre-colonial religious and social accommodation of differing sexuality, have remained Victorian in attitude long after the colonial powers have changed. In terms of gay rights, we really need to catch up, and be more honest to ourselves and each other.        Tweet     Sri Lanka and India, despite our pre-colonial religious and social accommodation of differing sexuality, have remained Victorian in attitude long after the colonial powers have changed. In terms of gay rights, we really need to catch up, and be more honest to ourselves and each other. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Indi.ca comments on the rights of the homosexuals:  Sri Lanka and India, despite our pre-colonial religious and social accommodation of differing sexuality, have remained Victorian in attitude long after the colonial powers have changed. In terms of gay rights, we really need to catch up, and be more honest to ourselves and each other.        Tweet     Sri Lanka and India, despite our pre-colonial religious and social accommodation of differing sexuality, have remained Victorian in attitude long after the colonial powers have changed. In terms of gay rights, we really need to catch up, and be more honest to ourselves and each other. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
