How Not To Choose A Bride

Wedding Couple Dancing

Wedding couple statue, Kalpitiya.


Wow. This is a cavalcade of retardation. Via Dinidu, this is advice from The New India Express on choosing a bride. This advice from Dr. Titus Sankaramangalam in insanely dumb, it’s like Scientology in that he uses a lot of scientific sounding words to describe a crazy and offensive thesis. For example: “Look for symmetry. An easy way to find this out is to look at her elbows to see whether they are shapely and symmetrical. Large breasts are no good unless they are of the same size and shape” (How to choose a bride? What science has to offer?).

As you’ll notice the title of the article has a question mark, like, what science has to offer? Really? Because it’s not. This is just such a pack of nonsense that I wonder if it’s a joke. It seems to be all about fertility:

First commandment: The girl should have an hour-glass figure. Sadly, only eight percent of our girls will have an hour-glass figure… An hour-glass figure means that your child will also be intelligent because the girl will have enough omega three fatty acids on her thighs for the child’s brain development during pregnancy. (ibid)

Some other suggestions include looking for someone younger than you, smarter than you, and fair. Apparently 25 is the cut off age. Remember, “Make a closer look at her face if circumstances permit. Look at her eyes from the front.”

RSS feed | Trackback URI

5 Comments »

Theena
2012-09-12 09:56:33

The fuck did I just read?

 
Kiri
2012-09-12 09:56:37

This is why i stare at boobs…

 
Giules
2012-09-12 10:44:31

Men who stare at boobs – coming soon at an Indian theatre.

 
2012-09-12 15:09:28

[...] How Not To Choose A Bride Rate this:Share this:MoreLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Indian homemaker and tagged Arranged Marriage, Dr Titus Sankaramangalam, Generalizations, How to choose a bride?, Indian Express – Kochi, Interesting facts about Misogynists, Misogynists, Misogyny, Prospective Bride, Women's bodies by Indian Homemaker. Bookmark the permalink. [...]

 
rajith
2012-09-13 00:07:27

Indi,

All though the facts sound politically incorrect, scientifically it’s correct according to what is commonly agreed upon by folks who study this area. I once had a long conversation with a grad student at UofT who is studying this subject and the points she made are more or less what this man says.

I agree with your comment about “a wife is more than a fertility product”. But unfortunately we are all genetically preprogrammed to take that route. We subconsciously (men and women) make decisions about our mates based on these biological preferences. Even factors such as financial stability are related to the ability to take care of offspring. Health and ability to protect the offspring are the primary factors that influence how we choose mates.

Countless studies have shown that people tend to mark humans with good symmetry as attractive. And countless studies have shown that people with good symmetry are healthy. There is a lot of scientific literature around this area.

While this article may sound offensive or insensitive on the surface, scientifically it has some grounding.
The author could have explained the background info a bit more and perhaps worded it a bit better.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


40 Under 40 (1)

sharanga: Congratulations !

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa) (19)

David Blacker: Who cares, man? you’re still moaning on about a fight you lost months ago. It’s like the kid who gets his ass kicked then talk big later. You lost, you ran away like a whiney ponneya, and now you’re actually...

sharanga: A more accurate description would be I had my penis up your because you were refusing to answer a simple question. Now the fact that you thought I was not just Heshan, but also meechum just shows that you are stupid, and therefore your...

David Blacker: Come, come, you ran away from that debate with tail tucked in your panties. Too late late to be a hero now, man. Why don’t you make up a few more “facts 221;? As for you being Heshan, etc, well, can you blame me? All...

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee (5)

sack: Indiz post about Gotabhaya had much more comments. http://indi.ca/ 2012/07/gotas-p uppy-hate/

Liberal One: He he, the article with the least number of comments out of Indi’s recent ones. Looks like no body wants to put their lives at risk by commenting on the wrong article. I’m off as well.

max: Every family should have a Fredo

The Arrest Of Azath Salley (21)

tastyjujubes: Well Nafi, why are you worried about the Jews and Israel and the US and western culture? Simple fact is that a lot of people do not want Sri Lanka to be an Islamic country or another Saudi Arabia. Sri Lanka has a long tradition of...

sharanga: //Azath Salley by any means if he had said that in India he should get punished by law// Nonsense. Azath Salley was perfectly within his rights to say what he said. Freedom of Speech means you have the freedom to say anything you may...

sharanga: @Nafi, My problem is that I don’t like religious fanatics. That is why I don’t like Bodu Bala Sena either (plus the fact they are stupid). I believe it is true if I said the Muslims are more religious than the Buddhists or...

Monolithic Islam

Mohsin Hamid, author of How To Get Filthy Rich In Rising Asia, has a nice op-ed in the Guardian. Money quote for me was ‘Individuals are undeniably real. Groups, on the other hand, are assertions of opinion’. If you go buy news reports Muslims or Jews or Sri Lankans or any number of groups can appear monolithic and uniform. When you meet people, however, you find that they’re not. If you meet enough people you hopefully become aware of that tendency and judge people less by group identity in advance. Muslims, however, are quite publicly tarred with the same brush these days, and it really isn’t fair. Or accurate.

40 Under 40

I’m happy to be featured in Echelon magazine’s 40 Under 40 feature, profiling young people who contribute to the economy in some way, mainly in business but also in terms of innovation and thought leadership. It’s an interesting article not just in that I’m in it (mainly for work on indi.ca and Kottu but also YAMU) but also in that the magazine takes a bit of a critical stance. It’s worth reading the editorial (which I can only find in print) where they describe that only a few women are included and that all of the 40 are from middle to upper middle class backgrounds.

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee

I won’t add too much commentary, but just read I guess. The youngest Rajapaksa, Rohitha (Chi Chi) has given an amazing interview to the Daily Mirror Life section, which is well worth a read. In other news, he also recently slapped a referee around in full public view at a rugby match. At least it seems that his elder brother restrained him.

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa)

In 2009 this strange character appeared on the Sri Lankan Internet scene, getting angry, flaming, trolling whatever. Then he started naming anonymous bloggers, posting comments as people’s kids, nasty stuff, for which I removed him from Kottu. He also published some plagiarized stuff on Groundviews. He flamed out a bit more then disappeared. Until now. Now he’s back hosting a rather expensive social media event in Colombo, which is a bit ironic, seeing as he was known for being the most anti-social person the blogosphere had seen at the time.