First Indian In Playboy

sherlyn chopra

Sherlyn Chopra at playboy.com.


Indian women are renowned as some of the most beautiful in the world, but they still haven’t appeared in Playboy. Until now. Bollywood C-lister Sherlyn Chopra (Twitter) will be the first Indian to appear nude in the softcore glad rag this November (Hollywood Reporter).

Despite being historically and religiously more open about sexuality (the kama sutra, no majore proscriptions in Hinduism), modern India has some major issues treating women honorably. Of G20 economies, India was recently rated the worst place to be a woman, worse even than Saudi Arabia. Crime against women is rising, especially cruelty in the home.

The same voices that are appalled at a woman’s naked body in print are often part of the acquiescence to the casual crime and abuse that takes place, usually at home. I’m not saying posing nude is the answer to India’s social ills, but loosening up a bit might help. Still, I can’t imagine how much trouble Ms. Chopra is going to get if she continues to live in India. That said, however, Indian-origin porn star Sunny Leone has made a pretty successful entry to Bollywood (filming in Sri Lanka also), so perhaps slowly the country is beginning to change.

Perhaps the issues aren’t connected at all. Perhaps that’s just me. I do think a woman’s body is hers to do what she wants with. Within families and relationships that’s obviously negotiated, but on a social level, if she wants to pose naked, that should be totally fine. If a woman wants to wear a miniskirt and walk around a city, also fine. That it’s currently not advisable in India or here is one thing, but the solution isn’t to hide women away.

There’s one school of thought that the world is that way so to keep women safe they must behave a certain way. But that doesn’t work. It just leads to women being abused or dowry killed or girls being aborted in the family structures that are supposed to protect them from the hostile streets.

Personally, I think the solution is more openness and to change the bad parts of the world, not to ask women to simply work around them. Does that have anything to do with an Indian in Playboy? Maybe not. But in my head it’s a good thing.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

9 Comments »

Indra
2012-08-21 18:06:15

“Indian women are renowned as some of the most beautiful in the world” — Rubbish. Indians women are the ugliest in the world. Dark skinned and ugly. Why this kind of “false” thinking comes from the sheer size of the population. Out of 1.2 BILLION people, even if 1% are really beautiful, i.e. 12 Million. You get a huge amount, but look at the percentage. 99% are butt ugly. This is the thing with India. India has 1% very beautiful women, however 99% are dark skinned and ugly or just plain. Do you know that the India is the biggest market for skin whitening creams. Not only Indian women but men also are havily into skin whitening creams. So why do you think that is???? I think you have to look at the big picture. If you don’t believe me just look at a typical street screen in New Delhi or Bombay:

http://www.bugbog.com/images/galleries/india-pictures/A-india-photos/delhi-india/busy-street-new-delhi.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/232/466573816_3366025441.jpg
http://s1.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20120423&t=2&i=598414981&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CDEE83M1U2K00

Great for people watching, don’t you think???? :-D

FreedomFromTurds
2012-08-24 14:44:08

Absolutely agree with you on this. Here is the Indian population (1.2 billion ) broken down:
(a.) 1/2 are downright unattractive.
(b.) Another considerable chunk are plain (neither ugly nor beautiful).
(c.) Very minute % are very beautiful.

I would disagree with the 1%. I’d say it is more like 0.1% that’s beautiful. That’s about a million.

Indians are overrated, overhyped garbage. Has anybody being to India??? It is literally a TOILET. Just one big gigantic toilet. Indians are also the rudest people in the planet with horrific manners (or lack of it). I don’t know why Indi is buttkissing Indians like this???

Pride
2012-08-24 21:24:02

Dark skinned filth. They dream of washing the black out of them but even if you see a face that dont look ape
just look at their bodies, all hair and darkness where the bleach didnt reach.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
2012-08-21 20:32:41

lol you shameless fucking stat whore.

Indra
2012-08-22 15:30:26

Stats are facts man. I was just stating the obvious which may be hard to digest. But this is a the truth. Indians are UGLY. That is the General Rule. Ok about 1% are beautiuful but that is only the exception. Exceptions don’t make the rule. I am assuming you are an Indian??? Hik hik LMAO

 
 
Such
2012-08-22 00:24:59

Burqas are the answer. Burqas are an excellent invisibility device. All women and men for that matter should wear them. If you are invisible no one can see you ergo you will not be harassed. In theory anyway. I was in McDonalds today. Saw some stunning examples. As an aside how do they eat with them on? Do you need to keep lifting the veil or is their a slit for the mouth? Anyways awesome.

 
Such
2012-08-22 00:28:31

BTW Indra that’s no way to talk about your mum. She’s dark and tasty, a MILF for sure.

Indra
2012-08-22 15:37:38

At least my mum looks good, unlike your mommy -> http://tiny.cc/f0sfjw ROFL

 
 
Such
2012-08-23 22:33:14

Mom why are you sleeping with Indra?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


Monolithic Islam (2)

tastyjujubes: A Muslim is someone who follows Islam, yes? Islam teaches that all non-Muslims will burn in hell for eternity yes? So if one were to say that Muslims believe that all non-Muslims will burn in hell for eternity, would that be wrong?

Gorogoro: Yes there is diversity, but unfortunately the extremists and the fundamentalists among the Muslims seem to have a free reign. You can certainly make some generalizations when the ideology being followed is one and the same and is based...

40 Under 40 (1)

sharanga: Congratulations !

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa) (19)

David Blacker: Who cares, man? you’re still moaning on about a fight you lost months ago. It’s like the kid who gets his ass kicked then talk big later. You lost, you ran away like a whiney ponneya, and now you’re actually...

sharanga: A more accurate description would be I had my penis up your because you were refusing to answer a simple question. Now the fact that you thought I was not just Heshan, but also meechum just shows that you are stupid, and therefore your...

David Blacker: Come, come, you ran away from that debate with tail tucked in your panties. Too late late to be a hero now, man. Why don’t you make up a few more “facts 221;? As for you being Heshan, etc, well, can you blame me? All...

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee (5)

sack: Indiz post about Gotabhaya had much more comments. http://indi.ca/ 2012/07/gotas-p uppy-hate/

Liberal One: He he, the article with the least number of comments out of Indi’s recent ones. Looks like no body wants to put their lives at risk by commenting on the wrong article. I’m off as well.

max: Every family should have a Fredo

The Arrest Of Azath Salley (21)

tastyjujubes: Well Nafi, why are you worried about the Jews and Israel and the US and western culture? Simple fact is that a lot of people do not want Sri Lanka to be an Islamic country or another Saudi Arabia. Sri Lanka has a long tradition of...

Monolithic Islam

Mohsin Hamid, author of How To Get Filthy Rich In Rising Asia, has a nice op-ed in the Guardian. Money quote for me was ‘Individuals are undeniably real. Groups, on the other hand, are assertions of opinion’. If you go buy news reports Muslims or Jews or Sri Lankans or any number of groups can appear monolithic and uniform. When you meet people, however, you find that they’re not. If you meet enough people you hopefully become aware of that tendency and judge people less by group identity in advance. Muslims, however, are quite publicly tarred with the same brush these days, and it really isn’t fair. Or accurate.

40 Under 40

I’m happy to be featured in Echelon magazine’s 40 Under 40 feature, profiling young people who contribute to the economy in some way, mainly in business but also in terms of innovation and thought leadership. It’s an interesting article not just in that I’m in it (mainly for work on indi.ca and Kottu but also YAMU) but also in that the magazine takes a bit of a critical stance. It’s worth reading the editorial (which I can only find in print) where they describe that only a few women are included and that all of the 40 are from middle to upper middle class backgrounds.

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee

I won’t add too much commentary, but just read I guess. The youngest Rajapaksa, Rohitha (Chi Chi) has given an amazing interview to the Daily Mirror Life section, which is well worth a read. In other news, he also recently slapped a referee around in full public view at a rugby match. At least it seems that his elder brother restrained him.

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa)

In 2009 this strange character appeared on the Sri Lankan Internet scene, getting angry, flaming, trolling whatever. Then he started naming anonymous bloggers, posting comments as people’s kids, nasty stuff, for which I removed him from Kottu. He also published some plagiarized stuff on Groundviews. He flamed out a bit more then disappeared. Until now. Now he’s back hosting a rather expensive social media event in Colombo, which is a bit ironic, seeing as he was known for being the most anti-social person the blogosphere had seen at the time.