Gota’s War: Interesting But Wrong

Row Of Armored Vehicles


Gota’s War is a deeply biased book on a fascinating subject – Sri Lanka’s civil war. It mixes compelling detail (how the LTTE used lightbulbs to trigger underwater mines, for example) with absolutely biased and generally misleading opinion (Tamil leaders were to blame for almost everything, including riots). As such I found it only half readable. I could skim it for the war detail parts, but G.A. Chandraprema’s analysis itself was so narrowly biased (towards political conditions right now) as to be completely useless as a history.

David Blacker has read the whole book (and fought in the war) and has a much more comprehensive review. Blacker says it’s a book worth reading, and I guess so, but he also points out that the book scrubs out General Sarath Fonseka (except obliquely blaming him for killing Lasantha Wickremetunge), whitewashes every government decision, and blackguards any action by Tamil politicians or leaders.

Chandraprema takes a broad point (war necessary, LTTE bad) which even I could agree with and uses it to color what was in fact a nuanced and conflicted history. The war was all the more interesting because the good guys weren’t clear, the bad guys did noble things, and none of the players knew what was going on or how it would end up. By framing this around a central heroic figure (of Gotabhaya Rajapaksa) Chandraprema strains the historical record to the point of disbelief. His analysis is basically shit and makes you stupider if you believe it.

For example, this is one of the dumber sentences in the book, and quite possibly the English language:

The fact that this form of protest makes a moralistic pretence of being peaceful and non-violent may irk those at the receiving end of a Satyagraha even more than an honest and straight forward riot. (pg 31)

I mean, WTF, is an honest and straight forward riot? I can somehow picture a Britisher standing in some ruins saying ‘By gosh, that was an honest and straightforward riot’, except I can’t, because it’s ridiculous. Here as in many places you can see Chandraprema straining to fit reality into his pre-conceived narrative and IT JUST DOESN’T FIT. In many ways Chandraprema is trying to write a Ramayana rather than a modern history, which necessitates turning your enemies into demons and even some of your supporters into monkeys and bears.

At the same time, however, the book has a lot of very interesting detail. For example, how Muammar Gaddafi bailed out the government with a $500 million loan at the end of the war (pg 464). Or how the Army used a tea factory method to turn containers into dryers to keep the troops in decent clothes during the monsoons (pg 436). There was also a story about how the US defence attache gave black and white satellite images that showed where LTTE arms ships were hiding. Some of the most compelling stuff was the little innovative things both the LTTE and Army did. What stuck with me was that the LTTE laid sea mines that would be detonated by an ordinary light bulb. When a ship hit the bulb it would break and salty seawater would flood in, completing the circuit and detonating the mine. Then you get the story of how Army divers had to cover the bulb and delicately tow the mine to shore. The amount of sacrifice by soldiers is incredible, honestly on both sides.

It’s all fascinating stuff, but it has only extractive value. Chandraprema’s story as a whole is so biased as to be absurd at times and it’s completely misleading unless you have other sources or memory to refer to. I’ve heard that the Rajapaksas are passing the book around, but I wouldn’t recommend it as a first time read. It covers an interesting time with some interesting detail, but the book itself is as farcical and biased as the title would suggest. It wasn’t Gota’s War and the book only expands on and inflates that erroneous view. As such only the parts where Gota was a major player (Eelam War IV) are even moderately insightful and the book as a whole is bogged down by its narrow-minded focus on selling a point rather than telling a story.

I would, however, recommend Blacker’s review.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

3 Comments »

Theena
2012-07-09 11:39:29

‘By gosh, that was an honest and straightforward riot’

Sounds like something John Cleese and the Pythons would write in to their sketches. Also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCkFhafk26A

 
2012-07-09 12:56:02

I didn”t expect much from a book with that title. Probably inspired by this

http://www.foyleswar.com/

or perhaps

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0472062/

 
2012-09-17 15:37:02

[...] underworld types. The Island also has an interesting perspective from G.A. Chandraprema, author of Gota’s War, who calls the Silvas ‘exterminators of the [...]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


Monolithic Islam (2)

tastyjujubes: A Muslim is someone who follows Islam, yes? Islam teaches that all non-Muslims will burn in hell for eternity yes? So if one were to say that Muslims believe that all non-Muslims will burn in hell for eternity, would that be wrong?

Gorogoro: Yes there is diversity, but unfortunately the extremists and the fundamentalists among the Muslims seem to have a free reign. You can certainly make some generalizations when the ideology being followed is one and the same and is based...

40 Under 40 (1)

sharanga: Congratulations !

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa) (19)

David Blacker: Who cares, man? you’re still moaning on about a fight you lost months ago. It’s like the kid who gets his ass kicked then talk big later. You lost, you ran away like a whiney ponneya, and now you’re actually...

sharanga: A more accurate description would be I had my penis up your because you were refusing to answer a simple question. Now the fact that you thought I was not just Heshan, but also meechum just shows that you are stupid, and therefore your...

David Blacker: Come, come, you ran away from that debate with tail tucked in your panties. Too late late to be a hero now, man. Why don’t you make up a few more “facts 221;? As for you being Heshan, etc, well, can you blame me? All...

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee (5)

sack: Indiz post about Gotabhaya had much more comments. http://indi.ca/ 2012/07/gotas-p uppy-hate/

Liberal One: He he, the article with the least number of comments out of Indi’s recent ones. Looks like no body wants to put their lives at risk by commenting on the wrong article. I’m off as well.

max: Every family should have a Fredo

The Arrest Of Azath Salley (21)

tastyjujubes: Well Nafi, why are you worried about the Jews and Israel and the US and western culture? Simple fact is that a lot of people do not want Sri Lanka to be an Islamic country or another Saudi Arabia. Sri Lanka has a long tradition of...

Monolithic Islam

Mohsin Hamid, author of How To Get Filthy Rich In Rising Asia, has a nice op-ed in the Guardian. Money quote for me was ‘Individuals are undeniably real. Groups, on the other hand, are assertions of opinion’. If you go buy news reports Muslims or Jews or Sri Lankans or any number of groups can appear monolithic and uniform. When you meet people, however, you find that they’re not. If you meet enough people you hopefully become aware of that tendency and judge people less by group identity in advance. Muslims, however, are quite publicly tarred with the same brush these days, and it really isn’t fair. Or accurate.

40 Under 40

I’m happy to be featured in Echelon magazine’s 40 Under 40 feature, profiling young people who contribute to the economy in some way, mainly in business but also in terms of innovation and thought leadership. It’s an interesting article not just in that I’m in it (mainly for work on indi.ca and Kottu but also YAMU) but also in that the magazine takes a bit of a critical stance. It’s worth reading the editorial (which I can only find in print) where they describe that only a few women are included and that all of the 40 are from middle to upper middle class backgrounds.

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee

I won’t add too much commentary, but just read I guess. The youngest Rajapaksa, Rohitha (Chi Chi) has given an amazing interview to the Daily Mirror Life section, which is well worth a read. In other news, he also recently slapped a referee around in full public view at a rugby match. At least it seems that his elder brother restrained him.

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa)

In 2009 this strange character appeared on the Sri Lankan Internet scene, getting angry, flaming, trolling whatever. Then he started naming anonymous bloggers, posting comments as people’s kids, nasty stuff, for which I removed him from Kottu. He also published some plagiarized stuff on Groundviews. He flamed out a bit more then disappeared. Until now. Now he’s back hosting a rather expensive social media event in Colombo, which is a bit ironic, seeing as he was known for being the most anti-social person the blogosphere had seen at the time.