Why People Hate The Government

Your life is in there somewhere, and it sucks.


Governments are almost uniformly disliked, because they suck. Their main selling point is that they suck significantly less than no government, or really bad government, but that’s a hard sell.

How Sri Lankans Hate The Government

In Sri Lanka, there were and are many people who don’t want whatever current government to exist at all. Basically every ethnic group except the Muslims has rebelled (a lot of Burghers in the 1962 coup attempt) and even after rebellions were squashed, a lot of people are still bitchy about it.

Even now, some of the English Speaking Elite (ESE) media is almost entirely negative towards the government. Many diaspora Tamils are still calling for a separate state. The brouhaha about war crime investigations comes from this, what they really want is the decapitation of the Mahinda Rajapaksa government, brothers and all, which effectively ends the current government.

How Americans Hate The Government

America has an almost congenital aversion to governance. Their Constitution is largely a list of what government can’t do, their Declaration Of Independence an outline of when to overthrow it. In modern times, the small government idea was personified and almost deified by Ronald Reagan. The more toxic parts of his rhetoric have hung around while the realistic aspects of how he governed have largely faded.

In America it is pretty much de rigueur for politicians to campaign against government when they run. David Brooks addresses this in his latest Op-Ed

Roughly 10 percent of Americans trust government to do the right thing most of the time, according to an October New York Times, CBS News poll.

Why don’t Americans trust their government? It’s not because they dislike individual programs like Medicare. It’s more likely because they think the whole system is rigged. Or to put it in the economists’ language, they believe the government has been captured by rent-seekers.

This is the disease that corrodes government at all times and in all places. As George F. Will wrote in a column in Sunday’s Washington Post, as government grows, interest groups accumulate, seeking to capture its power and money. (Where Are The Liberals)

Corruption

What Brooks calls rent-seeking is essentially corrupt douchebags taking over the government. Scholars like Joseph Tainter have tied this behavior to the complete collapse of multiple civilizations, when the corruption basically gets out of control and the whole thing has to go. This is the feeling behind much aversion in Sri Lanka and the US, but it’s important to remember that these collapses are usually horrific and take decades if not centuries to emerge from. It’s basically a last resort.

The cure here doesn’t have to be destroying the government, it is essentially re-allocating resources. The people railing against a government are essentially knocking to get in. As Chinese blogger Han Han has written:

They hate the powers-that-be and corruption mostly because they wish that they (or their own relatives) have been the beneficiaries instead; they don’t care about restricting or supervising the authorities; they pick up the vocabulary about democracy and freedom only when ill luck befell them and they need to petition their causes. (Han Han On Revolution, Democracy And Freedom)

So What

The thing is that government is significantly better than no government, and good government is much better than bad government. Kings and all try to portray the government as awesome all the time, which is one way to do it, but as populations get more educated they are less likely to believe something so paternalistic and stupid. The modern citizen/government relationship is more teenager/parent than child/father. Hence the angst.

The Political Network

What Brooks calls for is a Steve Jobs/Martin Luther figure to ‘scrape the barnacles off the state’ and simplify everything. This could be Obama, or not. What I believe, which may sound kooky now, is that revolutions in personal and social computing will next be extended to the political network.

Modern government runs on paper and people, which have inherent problems and huge amounts of waste and opportunities for rent-seekers to emerge. As industries like music and textiles have been revolutionized by technology, so will government, soon enough. Tech has already started to empower more people, but it hasn’t yet been used by governments to really process more inputs. They’re learning the ropes via censorship and surveillance, but eventually those inputs will become part of a more modern democratic system.

Essentially, if you have bad governance, there’s an app for that, or there will be. There will certainly be a generation for whom such a thing is understood and from whom it can emerge organically. Right now, however, is like the brief interregnum (ongoing) where everybody used Windows XP, despite it sucking. It still sucked less than not having an operating system at all.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

the way of the dodo
2012-01-11 22:38:27

what’s all this talk about the TNA meeting the LTTE rump in south africa

 
shammi
2012-01-11 23:25:10

Just shows how serious the TNA is about reconciliation.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


Monolithic Islam (2)

tastyjujubes: A Muslim is someone who follows Islam, yes? Islam teaches that all non-Muslims will burn in hell for eternity yes? So if one were to say that Muslims believe that all non-Muslims will burn in hell for eternity, would that be wrong?

Gorogoro: Yes there is diversity, but unfortunately the extremists and the fundamentalists among the Muslims seem to have a free reign. You can certainly make some generalizations when the ideology being followed is one and the same and is based...

40 Under 40 (1)

sharanga: Congratulations !

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa) (19)

David Blacker: Who cares, man? you’re still moaning on about a fight you lost months ago. It’s like the kid who gets his ass kicked then talk big later. You lost, you ran away like a whiney ponneya, and now you’re actually...

sharanga: A more accurate description would be I had my penis up your because you were refusing to answer a simple question. Now the fact that you thought I was not just Heshan, but also meechum just shows that you are stupid, and therefore your...

David Blacker: Come, come, you ran away from that debate with tail tucked in your panties. Too late late to be a hero now, man. Why don’t you make up a few more “facts 221;? As for you being Heshan, etc, well, can you blame me? All...

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee (5)

sack: Indiz post about Gotabhaya had much more comments. http://indi.ca/ 2012/07/gotas-p uppy-hate/

Liberal One: He he, the article with the least number of comments out of Indi’s recent ones. Looks like no body wants to put their lives at risk by commenting on the wrong article. I’m off as well.

max: Every family should have a Fredo

The Arrest Of Azath Salley (21)

tastyjujubes: Well Nafi, why are you worried about the Jews and Israel and the US and western culture? Simple fact is that a lot of people do not want Sri Lanka to be an Islamic country or another Saudi Arabia. Sri Lanka has a long tradition of...

Monolithic Islam

Mohsin Hamid, author of How To Get Filthy Rich In Rising Asia, has a nice op-ed in the Guardian. Money quote for me was ‘Individuals are undeniably real. Groups, on the other hand, are assertions of opinion’. If you go buy news reports Muslims or Jews or Sri Lankans or any number of groups can appear monolithic and uniform. When you meet people, however, you find that they’re not. If you meet enough people you hopefully become aware of that tendency and judge people less by group identity in advance. Muslims, however, are quite publicly tarred with the same brush these days, and it really isn’t fair. Or accurate.

40 Under 40

I’m happy to be featured in Echelon magazine’s 40 Under 40 feature, profiling young people who contribute to the economy in some way, mainly in business but also in terms of innovation and thought leadership. It’s an interesting article not just in that I’m in it (mainly for work on indi.ca and Kottu but also YAMU) but also in that the magazine takes a bit of a critical stance. It’s worth reading the editorial (which I can only find in print) where they describe that only a few women are included and that all of the 40 are from middle to upper middle class backgrounds.

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee

I won’t add too much commentary, but just read I guess. The youngest Rajapaksa, Rohitha (Chi Chi) has given an amazing interview to the Daily Mirror Life section, which is well worth a read. In other news, he also recently slapped a referee around in full public view at a rugby match. At least it seems that his elder brother restrained him.

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa)

In 2009 this strange character appeared on the Sri Lankan Internet scene, getting angry, flaming, trolling whatever. Then he started naming anonymous bloggers, posting comments as people’s kids, nasty stuff, for which I removed him from Kottu. He also published some plagiarized stuff on Groundviews. He flamed out a bit more then disappeared. Until now. Now he’s back hosting a rather expensive social media event in Colombo, which is a bit ironic, seeing as he was known for being the most anti-social person the blogosphere had seen at the time.