How Tech Companies Don’t Create Jobs

will code for food

Photo by bugbbq


The new tech-industrialization doesn’t create many jobs. Not directly. Apple employs around 50,000, which seems good until you consider that their Chinese supplier FoxConn employs 800,000 (at suicide-inducing work). Facebook only employs about 2,000 and takes pride in not creating jobs. Check out their COO, Sheryl Sandberg:

“We think one of the best ways to stay small is just to stay smaller,” Sandberg says later.

As the meeting winds down, a product manager shows a slide that nearly makes Sandberg jump out of her seat. The chart displays Facebook’s advertising revenue and volume—both lines are tilting upward. It also shows the number of man-hours spent on support operations, a line that holds steady. “This is a beautiful chart. I might frame it on my wall,” Sandberg says. “Guys, this is the difference. This is about, how big do we want to be as a company? (BusinessWeek)

The Emerging (Low-Margin) Dream

Facebook and other companies automate aggressively to minimize headcount. What they do do (I said doodoo :) is enable small businesses and entrepreneurs to do their jobs better. I recently bought an ad from a newspaper and had to talk to five different people across about 20 emails and 5 international calls. With Facebook I waste zero time and get better results. I prefer Facebook.

Personally, I get a check from Google for advertising across different sites. I’m able to market stuff cheaply on Facebook. So I guess they do create jobs in that sense. For foreigners that can live off such efficiency.I’m making below the US poverty line, but that’s solidly middle class in Sri Lanka. From an American perspective, however, it means less jobs. In that sense, it’s not good from a human perspective either. As Intel’s Andy Grove writes:

What kind of a society are we going to have if it consists of highly paid people doing high-value-added work—and masses of unemployed?

Since the early days of Silicon Valley, the money invested in companies has increased dramatically, only to produce fewer jobs. Simply put, the U.S. has become wildly inefficient at creating American tech jobs. (Andy Grove, BusinessWeek)

The American Myth

What Americans are sold on is the American dream, the myth that they somehow have a chance to make it really rich. This is the dream that drove the housing collapse when they tried to live it and, even as a vapor, it clouds their policy.

Americans love the idea of the guys in the garage inventing something that changes the world. New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman recently encapsulated this view in a piece called “Start-Ups, Not Bailouts.” His argument: Let tired old companies that do commodity manufacturing die if they have to. If Washington really wants to create jobs, he wrote, it should back startups.

Friedman is wrong. Startups are a wonderful thing, but they cannot by themselves increase tech employment. (ibid.)

Basically, the US startup culture is creating a few highly-paid jobs and a lot of really lowly paid jobs abroad. Small business and entrepreneurs saving the (American) economy is a political fairy tale.

Entrepreneurship is still one of America’s great strengths, right? Wrong. Rates of new-business creation have been contracting since the 1980s. Funny enough, that’s just when the financial sector began to get a lot bigger. The two trends are not disconnected. (TIME)

So, uh, what gives? Revolutionary companies don’t actually create jobs, but they do increase productivity. That productivity, however, is largely the product of outsourcing or technology, not hiring. It makes a few US tech geniuses and venture capitalists rich, largely by outsourcing or automating jobs. So the net amount of American jobs is lower. It is now easier to make a living following your passion (making music, cupcakes), but that’s still really hard if you can’t pay the rent or get married. The result of this transition is still a lot of immediate pain.

I’d say that I’m here and American salaries are bloated anyways (they are), but India and China and purported leaders are still basically copying American intellectual property and innovations. You don’t want to kill the golden goose. I think it still has some eggs.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

8 Comments »

2011-07-13 12:12:21

Have you read Fault Lines ? an engrossing read! Raghuram Rajan (former chief economist at the IMF, now at the Booth School) talks a lot about this in chapters 4 and 5 (if I recall correctly) check it out if you haven’t. I couldn’t put it down!

 
Magerata
2011-07-13 13:10:01

Man, you are off the mark! I work (two days a week in evenings) for a tech company part time and I guess I make enough to pay for my college fees, which at the moment is as expensive as an old space shuttle, and that company has about 110,000 world wide. Then I am an intern (three days a week straight from my campus) at another company and they have about 72000 employees world wide (I just heard they will be laying off about 11,000). It might be rare but as a student I can make 7-8K a month, including
I do not know about other people, but from a simple physics, robotics and electronics site I have brings in about 2-3k a month after sharing the income between three people. If I am (we are) to put more of an effort, we can certainly make more but we have no time.
American dream is very much alive and kicking. How do you think facebook that you like so much, came to be. code stealing collage drop out is an instant billionaire, where else could you do that?. And then those of Techcrunch, Gizmodo, Engadget, and the like made millions from simple blogs they started. Most bought out by AOL etc.
If you measure number of employees at facebook, why not research, how many more are earning a pay check because of facebook?
Forget about rent, the wise can get a house in bay are for $70k now, if you can get a mortgage from a bank :).
Yes the American dream is now internationalised :) but it is still alive. If you really want to have another dream look in the direction of China. My buddy, an ABC, dropped out of college went to China and is now a millionaire and climbing.
Golden goose, what will you do if you are really hungry, say starving? I would bloody well eat the goose and live another day to look for another golden goose.

the way of the dodo
2011-07-13 14:38:59

your i-20 should allow you only 20 hours of work per week. How on earth are you earning that much, unless you’re american.

Magerata
2011-07-17 22:06:08

I was born here :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
2011-07-13 14:03:11

@magerata, you don’t actually have a job and one of your companies is laying off 1/7th of its workforce.

I’m not saying that intelligent people can’t hustle. What this economy doesn’t create is stable, middle-class jobs like manufacturing did

Magerata
2011-07-17 22:11:35

on the job point I have to agree. My jobs are basically my giddy points / sources. Middle class is thinning as ever and I just read, 14 million are without jobs.
Continue to do what you do, it makes people to pause and think.

 
 
2011-07-14 10:11:38

An interesting take on it. On the surface of it, manufacturing does in indeed create a lot more jobs than high tech. Even then, I’d be interested to see how it compares to labor numbers from manufacturers a couple of decades ago, I’m guessing that all industries are automating more and more and leading to less lower end jobs in the first world. Third world economies aren’t too hard hit because of all the off shoring that is being done due to cheap labor.

Getting back to tech however, I think you might want to have a deeper look at the ripple effect of people building on these platforms. Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and may others may not directly hire masses of employees (they don’t actually need them, and also there’s a dearth of skilled labor in some markets), but they enable a lot of other people to build on these platforms and profit. Companies like Zynga wouldn’t have been able to go for massive IPOs (and generating jobs) if these platforms didn’t exist. Not to mention other ‘smaller’ platforms like WordPress – powering about 500 million sites on the web – which allow people to self publish and have a presence on the web and reaching out to newer markets. Even if only 5% of these blogs were successful, that would still be a pretty solid number.

 
2011-07-14 11:02:26

Good points John.

You are right that these technologies produce other jobs (just not directly).

One issue is that these jobs are lower paying. A few people in America get IPO rich and a lot of people abroad get a sustainable but low income (like myself). I’m not even saying this is necessarily bad, but it does intro a gap between rich and poor where middle class Americans have nothing

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


Monolithic Islam (5)

tastyjujubes: The Religion of Peace at work again: http://www.guar dian.co.uk/uk/2 013/may/22/wool wich-two-shot-i n-police-incide nt-live-coverag e

sharanga: Racial profiling is not racist if it works. Similarly, identifying groups among people is not wrong if it allows you to predict reality with reasonable accuracy. When you don’t know everything, you play the odds. For example, if I...

Dark Lord: Why is it so hard to buy pork anywhere in Sri Lanka? Most sellers don’t sell pork at all, or sell it only to known customers from a hidden storage at the back of the store, which goes like “don̵ 7;t tell anyone, we are...

40 Under 40 (6)

sharanga: Congratulations !

Malik: Looks like Mara and Co has blocked GossipLanka.com ????? What’s going on here??????????

Diyath: Congratulations Indi!.. All the best for your future tech endeavors!

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa) (19)

David Blacker: Who cares, man? you’re still moaning on about a fight you lost months ago. It’s like the kid who gets his ass kicked then talk big later. You lost, you ran away like a whiney ponneya, and now you’re actually...

sharanga: A more accurate description would be I had my penis up your because you were refusing to answer a simple question. Now the fact that you thought I was not just Heshan, but also meechum just shows that you are stupid, and therefore your...

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee (5)

sack: Indiz post about Gotabhaya had much more comments. http://indi.ca/ 2012/07/gotas-p uppy-hate/

Liberal One: He he, the article with the least number of comments out of Indi’s recent ones. Looks like no body wants to put their lives at risk by commenting on the wrong article. I’m off as well.

Monolithic Islam

Mohsin Hamid, author of How To Get Filthy Rich In Rising Asia, has a nice op-ed in the Guardian. Money quote for me was ‘Individuals are undeniably real. Groups, on the other hand, are assertions of opinion’. If you go buy news reports Muslims or Jews or Sri Lankans or any number of groups can appear monolithic and uniform. When you meet people, however, you find that they’re not. If you meet enough people you hopefully become aware of that tendency and judge people less by group identity in advance. Muslims, however, are quite publicly tarred with the same brush these days, and it really isn’t fair. Or accurate.

40 Under 40

I’m happy to be featured in Echelon magazine’s 40 Under 40 feature, profiling young people who contribute to the economy in some way, mainly in business but also in terms of innovation and thought leadership. It’s an interesting article not just in that I’m in it (mainly for work on indi.ca and Kottu but also YAMU) but also in that the magazine takes a bit of a critical stance. It’s worth reading the editorial (which I can only find in print) where they describe that only a few women are included and that all of the 40 are from middle to upper middle class backgrounds.

Chi Chi Hits The Scene, And A Referee

I won’t add too much commentary, but just read I guess. The youngest Rajapaksa, Rohitha (Chi Chi) has given an amazing interview to the Daily Mirror Life section, which is well worth a read. In other news, he also recently slapped a referee around in full public view at a rugby match. At least it seems that his elder brother restrained him.

Anti-Social Marketing (Nibras Bawa)

In 2009 this strange character appeared on the Sri Lankan Internet scene, getting angry, flaming, trolling whatever. Then he started naming anonymous bloggers, posting comments as people’s kids, nasty stuff, for which I removed him from Kottu. He also published some plagiarized stuff on Groundviews. He flamed out a bit more then disappeared. Until now. Now he’s back hosting a rather expensive social media event in Colombo, which is a bit ironic, seeing as he was known for being the most anti-social person the blogosphere had seen at the time.