The Case For Duplicity
Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
I was going to say hypocrisy’s not a sin, but perhaps that’s not the right word. Let’s say duplicity. Duplicity is not necessarily a sin. Sometimes ideals need to be out there as a matter of faith before they can be made real. Sometimes you can’t do what you say but it’s important to say it anyways. Though only sometimes. Human ideals have always outstripped our means. The religious faiths we claim to follow, the family values we claim to uphold, no one really follows them. If, however, we limit our words to describing what we do, we don’t create another world (however illusory) that is better. In a strange way, simply saying these things and reinforcing them socially does have a way of making them a reality over time.
Wikileaks has 3,166 documents on Sri Lanka. They’re releasing docs in batches, so we probably won’t see for months, but it should be interesting. The US was actually not that involved in the war and probably not party to much useful information, but perhaps their disapproval for the Rajapaksas would come across. I wonder wonder. This Wikileaks stuff is interesting, but I wish someone would leak what’s going on inside this government or deeper inside Arab governments rather than more information on what is already one of the more transparent government around. Anyways, these documents will come out, so keep yourself and myself posted. As you can see from above, there is info on seemingly every country on earth (the image is
Seeing as we all walked out of Africa and spread, borders are inherently illusory. So, as a thought experiment, this map has been circulating which shows nations given new land based on population. India, for example, gets to occupy Canada while Canada gets Pakistan. Pakistan is moved to Australia. We, sadly, lose Sri Lanka and are sent to what looks like Uzbekistan (uncool). Where people live, of course, has more to do with chance and war than mathematical sense, but it is interesting to see how the world would look if it was divided up equally (34 people per mi²).
My friend Nigel has been DJing a show on
I am a sucker for crime movies, and Un Prophete is reportedly one of the best. My report is, yes it is. I was watching Jay-Z on the Daily Show and he said what people primarily relate to in art is the emotions underneath (I love my mother, hate my father, etc). Despite the vulgarity of the subject matter, I think that is the value of the crime story as parable. Despite how civilized we think we are, life for humans has historically been tough and crime films are one way to access that archetypical (per Campbell) image of hero as someone who struggles. Doing things the right was is a struggle, but not in as much of a ‘Me Against The World’ sense. In seeing people that do wrong, sometimes that hero is more clearly defined. Plus I like the vulgarity.
The Wikileaks Cablegate drama is, on the face of it, interesting because of
Yesterday I wrote something in
Watched Eat Pray Love last night (
I’m not a boxing fan, but Filipino Manny Pacquiao is very interesting. I first heard of him in this
Journalist JS Tissainagayam was recently jailed for 20 years hard labor for what he wrote and only released by Presidential pardon. This, via Reporters Sans Frontiers, is (I think) his first interview. In it he talks about the state of censorship, and the people who now accept that state through self-censorship. I found this part almost boring as it is so, essentially, obvious, but perhaps that’s because I’ve now become part of the pathology of the thing. He also talks about how international pressure may have spurred this release, and how economic and political support should be contingent on media freedom. Despite working in the media, I actually don’t agree. In (by global norms) moderately repressive governments like this, engagement may be more productive than unenforceable boycotts. But I also haven’t been in jail for over a year.