Fealty Vs Reality

Poster on back of a bus, Galle
The General is in jail and threatened with hanging. The terrorist international mastermind is also in jail, but giving guided tours to diasporals. Other former terrorists are Ministers, getting perks and singing at weddings. It all seems rather topsy-turvy, but if you look at it right it makes sense. The LTTE is gone. It’s all about fealty now, and the threat is international. I say fealty and not loyalty because any allegiance is temporary. And the fealty to whom is obvious, Mahinda Rajapaksa. That is the defining narrative they are pushing, and that is all that makes this jumble of old enemies and new allies makes sense. It’s also the narrative that describes the international pissing contests with the EU and UN. It’s all about the big dog now and whether you’re with him or in the sea.
Me, against foreign influence I’m with Mahinda. I didn’t support his election, but I do support my President. I do think foreign bodies are meddling unduly, I do think a hostile and vengeful diaspora is driving this, and I do support stability under this elected government. That said, I think this narrative is nonsense and it cobbles together a mass of injustice and delusion under one curious throne. In this narrative Sarath Fonseka is a traitor for opposing Mahinda and Karuna is a traitor for supporting him. This conflates Mahinda and the state and punishes a war hero while elevating an actual war criminal.
I understand these things strategically, the first duty of the state is to exist and if l’etat is Mahinda, then perhaps that’s how it is. For now. My main concern is not really politics but reality, and this narrative is warping reality to a point I can’t really accept. I think the UN and diaspora are meddling, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have a point. We should atone for or at least acknowledge the civilians that died. I think Fonseka was dumb, but he’s not a traitor. Threatening him with hanging is not cool.
This stuff all makes sense if you dump the old narrative (LTTE vs Sri Lanka) and replace it with the new one (Mahinda vs Traitors and International Lackeys). Outside of this frame, however, stuff actually doesn’t make sense. I think Mahinda is actually doing a pretty good job but I don’t think Fonny is a traitor. I don’t think the UN should be meddling, but I do think they have a point which we should investigate locally. These ‘buts’ are about as welcome as a bare ass in Parliament so I don’t suppose they get anywhere, but that, I think, is closer to reality.
This thought is continued in this Sunday’s Leader
Today on the
Janith has updated
This is highly dubious. Miss Travel is a travel/social networking site that connects ‘Generous’ and ‘Attractive’ travelers. To, like, travel together, I guess. It all seems a bit like arranged prostitution and trafficking. This is part of a broader online trend to connect rich men to younger, attractive women. Sites like
Sri Lankan domestics never say anything, they just stop coming. My maid just stopped coming and when I finally pressed her she said I needed to get a washing machine. I was hoping to ride this one out, but I’ve run out of underwear and I have no choice. I finally caved and bought a washing machine, from 
Hi Indi,
80% of the diaspora cares less. They dont do any sort of ‘constructive lobbying’ that is a game changer. Now that the matter is geo-politics it will play accordingly. So please stop saying its all because of a ‘vengeful diaspora’.
But the Tamil diaspora is a pretty extremist lot, full of hatred and anger.
unfortunately so is the sinhala diaspora. Both are polarized.
Buwah hah hah ha
I basically don’t give fudge about traitors, heroes and zeros. I just want the country to grow. That takes a stable government and the President seem to have it. I respect him for what he did with LTTE. As much as we want to think LTTE is gone, I doubt it. The main actors are gone but have the feelings of people wanting to rebel gone? Diaspora will keep on fueling it. I think the diaspora care about the country or the Sri Lankans in the north/east insomuch as Prabakaran thought about children he sent out as war as fodder or suicide bombers. Someone needs to take care of those people, teach and show them that they are part and parcel of Sri Lanka.
General is an airhead but should he be in Jail? May be they should stitch his mouth and let him go. At the same time I think he will make a good politician! because I watched one of the actress turned politician, Paba I think, man talk about airheads. she had no clue. General will look like Einstein next to her.
Bankrupt Moon is wagging his non existent tail at SL while Guantanamo bay is still alive and fading away from people. I like to know what he thinks of Afghan kids that are dying every day! Perhaps Sri Lanka is the distraction. Even HRW has not seen anything happening in Afghanistan since 2005! SL should rebuke Moon and his goons!. (Hail Russia! Hail China!, for now! :)
But I wonder about all those children in Sri Lanka, who is thinking about them? ( I do and I am acting on it, my own (tiny little) way.)
Damn, the peace is as hard as war it seems and why the hell am I bothered so much? Indi, you got to stop provoking these thoughts.
What ever it is, I like the poster!
Magerata, peace is hard after a long war. Glad to know u are doing something abt it. Let us know if we can join/pitch in.
Good post Indi.
Agreed, good post Indi.
The so called ‘ethnic conflict’ in Sri Lanka has always been about these clowns playing games with each other, and not about normal people. There never was a conflict at the ordinary person level, which is surprising for a country that supposedly had a 30 year ‘ethnic conflict’. Even Ealamists, deluded as they are, don’t deny that.
At the top of the food chain it is always about who could dangle the biggest dick, er, political muscle for you ladies. Whether you are Tamil or Sinhalese, the real game is always against people from your own side. I guess we can say the same thing about our NGO friends as well.
Yo jcnars, taking notes?
Indi, when you say the UN is “meddling”, what really do you mean? Why is it wrong for the SG of the UN to pursue an investigation into whether an investigation/tribunal is the right way to go? I’d like to hear the argument, and not just trite references to sovereignty and terrorism.
Magerata, nice to know that you are helping!
Indi please don’t generalise. I am a Tamil living abroad. I care for the people & I’d also like to help. But I cannot do much when I hear about abductions (by forces including MR’s Tamil friends). Also, I feel like priorities are given to those who are on Rajapaksha family’s good books. As an individual I fear to get myself down there to help anyone. I don’t believe the war against Tamils are over yet….may be it will take some time to convince me.
It’s a shame the way the General is being humiliated whatever crimes/indiscretions he may have commited. The common people for whose peace of mind he sacrificed so much, should ask for him to be treated with more dignity.
As for him, he should learn to keep his big mouth shut. This country has plenty to deal with as it is.
Aadhavan (Like your name but don’t know what it means), from where I stand it doesn’t look as if the
SG of the UN has his list of priorities in order. Methinks there are way more cases where his attention and action are needed, and where UN resources would be better employed if he genuinely wished to protect the innocents of the world. His meddling comes too late. He should have done something effective when all this was happening here.
We do not need the meddling of Ban & Co. at this point. Their perceptions are based on secondhand information and their feelings are not really involved. They could even be somebody’s puppets.
The end of the war was brutal but it was short. Though this may sound callous, given the ramifications, I cannot think of any way in which the violence could have ended so abruptly other than by a decicive victory for one side.
I also do not think there was ever a war with zero atrocities.
I do belive that whatever happened should be acknowledged and redress provided wherever possible, as there could be no adequate redress for the loss of a life. Think tanks should be busy looking for ways to avoid a repeat. This should be done by the right thinking people of this country, not just by a bunch of foreigners who are paid to do a job. This is what educated people like you should be doing, building bridges towards reconciliation, as seccession could only breed more animosity, and lead us back to square one.
The common people should heed reasonable voices, and should stand united against the shrill shrieks of politicians with their narrow selfserving agendas.
Say, Indi, What happened to the Dodo? Miss him!
He’s gone the way of the dodo
:(
Yes, but…
The key phrase in the article is surely, “For now.”
1) The war has been won.. for now. There are many in the diaspora who left in the 80′s and the memories are still raw, still painful. Many of their children were brought up on stories of their families being murdered, losing their property and their dignity. Others will be incensed by the ‘end justifies the means’ attitude of the SL govt in the way the war was prosecuted. Some will want to fight on. Then there’s the money, the power, the fear. Like the IRA, the LTTE had also evolved into a criminal entity, earning millions of dollars worldwide from criminal enterprises, protection rackets etc. The players will want to keep playing – without the LTTE cause they are just criminals and will lose influence and support.
2) The displaced in the North and East seem to be calm as much as one can tell.. for now. Maybe enough effort is being made to assist them to rebuild shattered lives. Hard to say. The decline in the number of NGOs being permitted to function isn’t going to help.
3) The (likely) thousands of civilians killed can be forgotten… for now. How many civilians were killed in the last year or so of the war? Who knows? It’s not necessarily an easy process, but it is calculable (just look at scores of other conflicts for examples of reliable data gathering on the subject). There is still a sinister ambivalence over this thorny issue, with even liberals openly saying things like: “yeah, it’s bad that people died, but we have to move on.” Are we really saying that all those dead can just be ignored, airbrushed out of history? Whether the UN is meddling or not, it is a legitimate line of enquiry, no?
4) There is stable government… for now. With considerable popular support, a lack of any credible opposition and a ridiculous number of ministers, most seemingly willing to toe the line for continued employment and perks, there’s no threat to this government anytime soon. However, what separates this government from so-called banana republics? The President is lauded, yet he controls what, 70 – 80% of government spending with his two family members sitting at his side. Accountability, people? How much is being siphoned off to pet projects, secret bank accounts, friends and relatives? Who would dare ask questions, or investigate? Or doesn’t anyone care?
5) The govt has detained thousands of suspected and actual LTTE members (again, how many – 10,000?) without due process… for now. Hard to see what else they could have done in the circumstances. However, the SL courts have already criticised the govt for saying that such people are being ‘re-educated’ whereas they are actually being dumped in prisons, with no rehabilitation or other schemes to facilitate release. How long can these people be detained for? What is the process of ‘re-education’ (hopefully the previous uses of that term – in North Korea, China, USSR etc – are not models)? What are the ramifications of indefinite detention, or indeed of releasing angry, bitter young men?
This is a time of great opportunity for Sri Lanka, but the ‘Tamil problem’ is far from resolved and inward investment/tourism requires confidence in the system. The President’s brother screaming like a mad man about hanging Fonseka on BBC’s Hardtalk doesn’t help. The recent attitude of the SL Govt to the EU letter on the tariffs comes across appallingly – no serious country reacts in that way, regardless of the rights or wrongs of the provocation. Clearly the Govt’s pride is more important than trying to retain a hefty 10% tariff reduction for SL exports. The SL govt comes across as proud, stubborn and short-sighted both internally and externally. This is perhaps natural given the circumstances of the past year or so, but it’s only sustainable… for now.
I like your take : ‘for now’. nice piece
Can someone help me out with all this shouting about the GSP plus. Didn’t Sri Lanka get this AFTER the tsunami, in order to help rebuild the country. Meaning, if not for the tsunami Sri Lanka wouldn’t have GSP plus anyway…
Now I understand that people may lose their jobs if GSP plus is lost…but isn’t it just a crutch that SL is trying to hold onto? Shouldn’t SL be able to survive without GSP plus.. what if there was no tsunami??
People will lose their jobs- according to the Sunday Leader. Funny thing, nowhere else can their statistics be found. Who cares about the GSP plus? It will teach our local industries they need to focus on their inward markets and be more competitive, instead of relying on handouts. We are a nation of handouts, hence the moaning at the slightest attempt to fix the problem.
“We are a nation of handouts” – that’s what I was thinking… The GSP plus was given to countries overcoming some sort turmoil. Now that the war is over, and the tsunami has long gone shouldn’t SL be trying to stand on its own two feet?
The Sunday Times quoted an Apparel Industry guy saying around 40,000 jobs had been lost in the past 14 months and that many more could be affected by GSP. The Central Bank press release itself says that 50% of apparel exports are to EU and that 60% of them will be affected by GSP+ (quoted in The Leader)
So what did SL do before the GSP….
@Nav – GSP+ was initially designed to level the playing field after the MFA (multi-fibre agreement) was over in 2005 and then given as a crutch post-tsunami..
Thanks… so it is truly a crutch… shouldn’t SL be trying to survive without one..
Interesting article:
Sri Lankan firms can excel without GSP+ facility
According to industry experts, Sri Lankan industries possess the ability to achieve higher levels even without the General System of Preference (GSP+) discount.
http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/newsdetails.aspx?news_id=88275
Dear Indi,
Why are you against foreign (UN) intervention? Some would say, your writings on sri lanka is, sort of, foreign intervention. After all you are a foreign national? No man is an island unto himself, especially in this modern or post modern age of a borderless world. Who actually is your president? Barack Obama or Mahinda?
You call Sarath Fonseka a war hero? How sad, thousands of Tamil civilians were killed
You can’t be a war hero without killing people. Bit inconvenient, but what to do?
Thank you David for showing your true colours, racist.
You call it inconvenient, but what to do? All because they were Tamil people, ain’t that right?
75,000 killed to get one man. talk about precision
Dude you should cut the bull shit, seriously. 75,000 people didn’t die and you don’t have a shred of demonstrable evidence to support that claim. Firstly, it’s funny how despite the completely lack of any new evidence the supposed death toll has gone from 7000 to 10000 to 15000 to 40000 and now it’s 75000. that is bloody hilarious. are you guys goldfish? Secondly, if you seriously think the war about getting one person you need to seek some professional help.
That’s war, Myil. If you don’t want to kill or die, play cricket. 60,000 before we got Wijeweera. Hundreds of thousands and still counting to get Saddam. Millions before they got Hitler. The whole problem was that Eelam became one man. And to idiots like you, it’s still about that one man. The question is, really, how many more Tamils would you have sacrificed for that one despot?
Dear David Blacker,
Can’t leave the brusque remarks out, can you?
I agree with your point about deaths in wars. But the GoSL did not take precautions in the final stages to prevent Tamil civilians deaths. In fact, the very fact that they were Tamil made it easy to bomb them. The GoSL siding with their ethnicity created this problem, as I’ve said before, GoSL is the cause and LTTE the symptom.
I hold nothing for prabha, his strategy of empowering the sinhala extremists while taking out the moderate Tamil leaders has left the Tamil community in a challenging position. You should stop thinking like that.
Eelam is not about one man. Hijacking the cause was one man. All this could have been settled amicably if GoSL leadership was willing to be flexible.
I wouldn’t have sacrificed anyone. But for the cause there were those who were willing to stand up. It was a rightful cause started by nonviolent agitation, which was responded with state terror.
Dear The Way of the Dodo,
you said:
“Dude you should cut the bull shit, seriously. 75,000 people didn’t die and you don’t have a shred of demonstrable evidence to support that claim”.
My response:
It’s not BS. There is evidence. Video clip showing soldiers killing Tamils, etc. The International Crisis Group(ICG) came out with a report that says 75,000 people are unaccounted for. Former UN spokesman, Gordon Weiss, claims 40,000 or more. Why would ICG lie? what is in it for them to lie? Other sources of evidence is the fact that the GoSL did not allow any reporters into the area. What do they have to hide? What’s the cover up for? The other evidence, the GA of Mullaithivu said around 375,000 people in the Vanni but only 300,000 came out. I’d believe the ICG more than the GoSL. Do I have to start on why I don’t trust the GoSL? Isn’t it pretty obvious.
You said:
Firstly, it’s funny how despite the completely lack of any new evidence the supposed death toll has gone from 7000 to 10000 to 15000 to 40000 and now it’s 75000. that is bloody hilarious. are you guys goldfish?
My response:
The 7000 figure was a conservative estimate at the early stages and later on there were more attacks but it was hard to document because media was not allowed. Anyway, 75,000 people are now unaccounted for. Where did they go? Should we presume aelian abduction? Videos showing Tamils being executed by the armed forces, which was proved authentic. The president says not even one civilian was killed. Prof. Rajiva Wijesinghe said around 5,000 civilians were killed. These once again show the lack of tact and articulation in lying by the GoSL bigwigs.
You said:
Secondly, if you seriously think the war about getting one person you need to seek some professional help.
My response:
It was about getting prabhakaran because the LTTE was a one man show. The war was over on the 16th of May but the news of Prabhakaran’s death came May 18th, which sent the president ecstatic and as well as sinhala people. People were getting ready to celebrate but when they saw prabakaran’s body there was extra joy for president as well as sinhala people. Prabhakaran has been the defining feature of this war he’s been there since the beginning.
Myil is the world really that black and white for you. Either the ICG or GOSL nothing in between, Lol. But really where in the ICG report does it say 75,000 people died. The only mention of 75,000 is the pathetic bit of creative calculus they present in page 6 to show how 75,000 people could have possibly disappeared. Apparently 35,000 people lived in the IDP camps before May 2009, they claim to know that 330,000 were living in the 2nd no fire zone but provide no references to back up this claim. Then say that the maximum number of people in IDP camp was 290,000. The deficit comes to 75,000(35000+330000-290000=75000) so obviously the government killed 75,000. ? Cognitive bias and outright incredulity is glaring in this lazy bit of analysis. If I were to present this as part of a term paper to any of my profs I’d probably get a D for it. How the hell did these people get the 330,000 figure? And no, you can’t simply assume that just because 375,000 lived in Vanni all of them ended up in the no fire zone. Also there seems to be no provisions for people who managed to escape to India or didn’t get rounded up by the Army. And what about the people the people who were held separately as possible LTTE carders. None of this has been taken into account.
7000 figure isn’t a conservative estimate. it is actually a highly optimistic one, in more than one sense of the word. Even some of the UN staff admitted that the creative extrapolation some of these buffoons have used to concoct these figures is unacceptable. For example, in one ‘study’ the death toll was put at 15000. how they achieved this 15K is hilarious. They took the number of deaths reported to the hospital on one particular day and then multiplied that by a number by 5 and then multiplied again by the number of days the battle took place. The actually documented number of deaths is far lower than 7000. And even then some the claims made by aid workers have been clearly debunked as outright lying. Several of the supposed heavily shelled locations appeared to be untouched according the subsequent satellite imagery, so much for the genuine intentions of the NGO community. You can find this bit in the US congressional report on the war.
This of course brings us to the most interesting part of these allegations, where the fuck are all these bodies? The final no fire zone, where the supposed massacre of 75,000 took place, was less than 4 Km^2. With 75,000 people dying in their bodies should be littered everywhere. Why was this not the case? There are at least a dozen spy satellites flying over sri lanka several times a day, there is no way on earth those satellites couldn’t have picked up the bodies. They should have also pick up images of the government hastily trying to bury 75,000 there is no photographic evidence of this as well. Why is that so?
Dear The Way of the Dodo,
Thanks for your informative engagement.
The thing about a war situation is this – nothing can be 100% sure unless a proper investigation is allowed. That’s one reason why I support an independent investigation.
There are satellite images for example by U.S. satellites but they aren’t so willing to just provide them. Because then the U.S. would he held responsible to do an investigation or move to initiate some sort of investigation. So if the UN comes up with an investigation the U.S. might provide the satellite pictures or if they are doing their own investigation.
75,000 figure is mainly from the middle of January till the end of the war. But could also include those who died in the early phases of the war in vanni.
Anyway, my question is, if the GoSL didn’t kill anyone then why not allow an investigation to remove all doubt?
What is the GoSL hiding? If there is nothing to hide then why all the fuss with the int’l media being banned from the war zone, etc? GoSL could use the evidence to raise its international profile and get more tourists. Instead they keep evading.
The 75,000 bodies would have been burnt and all evidence covered up. That’s why no one was allowed into the war zone until the military cleaned up it’s dirty work.
The GoSL got the doctors from the Vanni to lie to the media about casualties. But ICRC evacuated around 13,000 people with shrapnel wounds and shell attack wounds. how do you explain that?
The president says not one civilian died. Can we really believe this? While Prof. Rajiva Wijesingha says about 5,000 died.
The GoSL’s contradictory statements it self shows the GoSL is being dishonest.
75,000 people are unaccounted for, where are they? Their relatives want to know
Please refer to the following web pages to see how areas where IDP shelters were were bombed and other related issues
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6337805.ece
http://blog.amnestyusa.org/asia/satellite-imagery-offers-glimpse-on-sri-lankan-war-zone/
Ha ha, so Myil, you come up with all these figures, then when the Dodo shows you how insubstantial they are, you claim that since no one knows what happened, ANYTHING could happen. Yes, MAYBE their are green men on Mars, and until a UN panel is allowed up there, anything is possible. Dude, it’s because of this absolute laziness on the part of lobbyists to even attempt to prove these allegations that makes any attempts fall flat.
You’re grasping at straws: the US won’t provide the satellite pics. Who told you this, an uncle in DC? The Tamils in SL won’t talk because they’re scared. How convenient for you Tamils outside SL to talk instead. You say that 13,000 wounded were evacced, but how does that tot up to your 75,000? All you have is pure conjecture, assumptions, and really bad arithmetic.
You say that the GoSL didn’t take adequate measures to protect the civilians, and yes, you’re right, but that is not a war crime. That is callousness, and unfortunately war is not a place for gentle babies. Nor did I see any attempt by the LTTE to adequately protect civilians during terrorist attacks. It was a tough and dirty war and, in the words of Kurt Vonnegut, “So it goes.”
You say that the civilians were easier to kill because they were Tamils. Well, let me tell you that both races die pretty much the same. Didn’t you notice the 60,000 killed between ’87-’89? They didn’t need to be Tamil. Don’t let your unreasoning racism and hatred of this government disrupt your intellect.
This administration is very opaque, paranoid, and corrupt, but that doesn’t mean that they’re hiding war crimes. You’re just assuming it. For years, Saddam Hussein refused to cooperate with UN WMD inspectors, and the west assumed that this meant he was hiding something. Millions of deaths later, and billions of dollars later, we know the US was wrong. Don’t assume anything. There isn’t a shred of evidence of genocide or any serious war crimes. Never mind controversial evidence, never mind circumstantial evidence; there isn’t a shred of ANY evidence. Cooking up this huge conspiracy in which everyone from the US to India to China is ganging up together to save the Rajapakses is just plain foolish.
You ask why the GoSL won’t allow an independent inquiry. My question is why should they? Will the US allow one in Iraq or Afghanistan or at Abu Ghraib or at Guantanamo? Will India allow one in J&K? Will ANY sovereign western nation allow a UN investigation into any domestic issue? So why must a small third world nation allow this?
Even the most basic of police searches of private property requires a search warrant. And the latter requires evidence of probable cause at the very least. So Myil, come with your search warrant and we’ll let you in. The Security Council denied Ban a warrant, so he set up his own panel.
You say that Mahinda is lying when he says that not one civilian died, you say that the GoSL statements are contradictory. Well, no shit, Sherlock, politicians are liars. They all are. From Mahinda to Ban Ki Moon to Obama. The only thing that keeps them honest is the likelihood of getting caught. but it doesn’t make them war criminals.
The media is full of talk of the ‘SL Model’, that this sort of counter-terror war will be taken to J&K and Burma and Pakistan and Israel. Well, guess what, that’s rubbish. The only part of this ‘model’ that will be used is the media component — in other words, NO media. Well do you think we invented this? We modified it from Israel who borrowed it from China who learned it from Russia who saw it in Spain. That’s all the media cares about — media freedom — and all they fear is the lack of it.
The fact of the matter, Myil, is that the western governments don’t care. All this agitation is by lobbyists and the media. In the end, this is just an advisory panel. It has no power. And it can only advice Ban. In the end Ban cannot force the Security Council to act, and there’ll be no sanctions without them. That’s what makes all this bullshit protests by Wimal and His Traveling Dance Troupe so ridiculous. Much ado about nothing.
Uh, I’m a Sri Lankan citizen by choice and descent. I was born in Canada and have Canadian dual. I don’t have any particular rights in America.
Sure you do have rights in America! as a human being you have rights in any country in this world. Countries may not want to acknowledge it but you do have rights as a human being
thanks for the clarification