Why Flickr Sucks

Photo from Yala, hosted on Flickr


When Flickr started life was great. I never saw anything so cool for sharing photos. It was simple, fast and had all the Web 2.0 buzzwords that made anything possible, integrating it into this site, uploading from phones, etc. They were innovating every week and I never knew what I would find. The ‘interestingness‘ algorithm, the geotagging, camera finder, the Creative Commons licensing (for fair use), etc. Slideshows, tagging, RSS, these things are all priceless and I use them still. However, once Yahoo bought the young company they basically stopped innovating and became more like, well, Yahoo. The only notable changes I’ve seen are that you have to use this kludgy Yahoo login now and the pages stopped working on Windows Mobile. Besides that I assume that Yahoo is covering the server costs and keeping the thing online (no small thing) but not really innovating. I love Flickr and we have a long relationship, but the thrill is gone. I find myself looking around.

This is not to say that consolidating a good thing is bad. I believe that if you have something simple that works you don’t need to keep reinventing it. I, for example, wish the Havelock tailors would just keep one stock of linen rather trying to get fancy with the polyester blends. I also admire Apple’s decision to make their new OS smaller than the last one. However, as things change, some adaptation may be judicious, wise, and even fun. Flickr, after undergoing and orgy of innovation in its start-up phase, has remained much the same. Furthermore, being bought by Yahoo hasn’t brought any synergies to the beast beyond a slow, lumbering quality. The only new thing I can remember from this period is a tie-up with Getty Images, which is too expensive to be of any use to me. Also a foray into short videos which I think was a failure.

But what could Flickr do?

Tagging

I love tagging and find it priceless to organize and reference the over 6,000 photos I’ve added to Flickr. However, I hate tagging (the verb). It’s a pain and the interface makes it neither fun nor easy. I think Flickr could innovate by making it somehow a game to tag these innumerable photos, maybe hiring keyboard jockies in the third world to do it (I’d pay), or employing some artificial intelligence to pick out colors, faces and basic objects. I think they’re experimenting with this on some level, but my overall tagging experience hasn’t changed from years ago.

Look and Feel

The look hasn’t changed for years, and I rarely if ever browse through Flickr now. I basically use it as an archive, just upload and keep, maybe display on the blog. The social networking component has basically failed and I think it’d be better if they somehow integrated with Facebook. I get more discussion if I post photos there, where as Flickr is now a bid of an anonymous server space. It is also a bit of a turn-off for professional photographers because it lacks serious sales capability and it just doesn’t look that cool anymore.

Hardware

Sharing photos should be dumb easy, even default. I think a Flickr camera which had a hardware switch for UPLOAD would be sweet. That is, you can take a photo and then upload it from the device, in the field. There are already Flickr/Wifi cameras that can do this and an iPhone app. The former suffers because WiFi is a limited and dying technology (deprecated by 3G/HSPA) and the latter because the photos aren’t that amazing and the price is high. I think the iPhone route is actually fine, but Apple is a bit of a dick to the developing world, giving us everything late and for a very high price. There’s a good opening for a cheap, simple camera that uploads to Flickr painlessly.

That, however, leaves viewing. Despite taking hundreds more pictures, I find it hard to replicate the pleasure I got from picking up 36 prints from the drug store. I find it very difficult to share photos with my Achchi (grandmother). If there was a nice digital picture frame (iFrame?) that connected to Flickr, again over 3G, that would be very cool. If it was cheap and simple and had solar power or something then maybe I could get some of that joy of looking at photos (independent of computer kludgery) back again.

Again, these are just things. Flickr used to surprise even me and come up with stuff that I didn’t think possible. Now it doesn’t disappoint, but it doesn’t delight either. I’m sure Yahoo gave them a bunch of money. I wish they’d do something cool.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments »

Comment by maf
2009-09-30 12:52:08

have you used picasa 3.5 – meant have face-recognition, geo-tagging and name tagging? Though personally not a fan of picasa on the mac..iphoto has become my standard and even allows uploading to facebook for distribution and storage..

good post – stopped using flickr about the yahoo took over too..

 
Comment by maf
2009-09-30 12:54:18
 
Comment by indi
2009-09-30 14:22:40

I use Picasa, but I don’t like their online version as much, and it doesn’t have the critical mass of Flickr. Like Windows, I don’t think I’d ever fully leave Flickr, but I’m not pumpd about it anymore.

Picasa also does RAW (digital negative) processing, but not to the extent I need. That’s another thing I wish Flickr would do, archiving RAW files

 
Comment by Dilantha
2009-09-30 17:46:16

Yahoo buys these sites for the members then they just keep it running. I was glad at least the delicious.com team did some updates after being bought.

 
Comment by kirigalpoththa
2009-10-01 13:18:40

For me, Picasa seem to be just fine for my requirements!

 
Comment by Ahamed Nizar
2009-10-05 23:41:06

Get on shutterchance. Its way better.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


The English Speaking Elite:
  • Mahinda: This is sort of a forum, isn't it? What I mean is that Indi posts something, everyone has a quick read, then starts using this space to air their own views and spread their own message or start their own little (quite often completely unrelated) arguments or whatever... Its got an organic quality, which I think is quite nice......
  • The way of the Dodo: I think we should take some of this stuff and create a forum. That allows for better discussion and more mature dialog. What do you guys think...
  • Mahinda: Just curious... Didn't mean to offend....
Much More Mahinda:
  • Mahinda: Lousy, uninteresting comeback with only mild entertainment value. Where's the wit? Where's the logic/justification to the comment? I'm disappointed in you......
  • David Blacker: Mahinda, I doubt you'd make a good bench press, never mind a press sec....
  • Mahinda: Machang Blacker! Where have you been??! Were you busy washing your hair or something? Oh sorry - you don't have hair, no? So why the offensive attitude? Don't you think I'd make a good press sec? ;)...
The Final Cross:
  • Mahinda: Flyovers, if effectively used, are an excellent method of improving the flow of traffic and congestion. Since you guys don't think the ones that have been built work terribly well towards that objective, lets just blame Mahinda and the Government for this and move on :) Ok. That was just a little joke, but on a serious note, I think development should be well thought out and also implemented in the most cost effective manner. Which...
  • Anon: To add to what Dodo say, before the fly-over there was stop-go traffic at the Dehiwala junction. After the flyover there is a continuous, but slow flow of traffic. Although I use that road only rarely in my limited experience the length of the queue and the time taken to travel is no better after the flyover, and may be slightly worse. Moving the bus stand would be an improvement at Dehiwala, think Nugegoda is somewhat more...
  • Anon: Thanks Shammi, there was a very good interview in the Nation a few years back that opened my eyes to him. Think he did a fair job at the port and according to reports did not take a large "grant" that was in the offing. Agree with Dodo that Mangala's chances of getting elected at the moment look pretty slip....

Related Posts


Why The LTTE Sucks At Their Job

Terrorism can be pretty awesome (as in possessing some awe). I mean, 9/11 made the US freak the fuck out for eight years without either a) capturing Bin Laden or b) rebuilding the towers. It obviously has its power. The LTTE used to do some bad-assed skeletor style destruction - slaughtering monks in temples, blowing up the Central Bank, exploding windows at Ladies College. Now they don't. I only noticed cause I got the news

Blogger Arrested?

I've been trying to track down more info on this Gayan Rajapakse chap all day. I've got nothing solid, so please let me know. There are two reports, one that he was remanded in Matale for insulting the Rajapakses, one that he had threatened them. I can't find the post or any corroboration. This is unique in that he was arrested for 'web comments'. I honestly don't know what he said or how indefensible/defensible it

Status Quo: Bad, But Not That Bad

I think Mahinda Rajapaksa won the Presidency. Fonseka has real legal concerns about the election, but it was free and fair enough for most observers. So now what? Me, I have to go to the bank and go get a wedding present. See, through all the seeming chaos, Sri Lanka actually runs fine. That is in many ways the paradox of the place. Sometimes it looks like the wheels are falling off but they never

5,000+ French Dead in Europe Heatwave



Sri Lankans Are Dying In Mullativu

What I hear from the Red Cross and UN people is that the situation is dire. About 250,000 civilians and LTTE are being herded into a 'safety zone' and sorted out with the bombs. The real asshole in this drama, however, is certainly the LTTE. They are preventing people going out and using human shields as policy. Don't get me wrong, they are a terrible stain on this nation and the world and the greatest