LX3: Shutter Speed


This LX3 has shutter control and it is good. The photo above was shot round 8 when it was dark and it’s overexposed. That being because I kept the shutter open for like 15 seconds. Low light is the holy-grail of photography for me, and this camera has pretty good manual controls. Keeping the shutter open is pants without a tripod or physically putting the camera down, and it doesn’t work for people. But it’s interesting nonetheless. Below I photographed the inside of my refrigerator with the door closed. I thought there were far more awesome things going on while I wasn’t looking. But still. This is the first time I’ve seen the inside of my fridge with the door closed. Better living through technology indeed.

There is nothing in my fridge except bottled water and beer. It really freaks my mom out.

There was a minute where the Fuji F30 was the best camera on the planet. For a minute it did better in low-light than, like, Dom’s SLR. Then the SLRs really stepped up and out. The new SLRs can shoot people indoors at night at insane resolution. And the compacts haven’t really caught up. ISO is one way of getting low light right. I think the Panasonic LX3 I’m using has crappier ISO than the Fuji, but it has manual controls. So I can simply keep the shutter open to let more light in. Or fuck with the F-Stop or any number of things. I honestly don’t know what the F thing is, I think it’s the hole in a violin. But there are any number of… possibilities.

In the distance you can see the US Capitol

My Flickr photostream is happening.

I like the LX3. If I was going to have sex with one camera, however, that would be the F30. That’s just how I feel.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments »

Comment by maf
2008-12-04 09:04:10

great pics.
just like being able to see Russia from your back garden ehh.

i think I would sleep with the new canon eos 5d mkii: check out http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2008/11/26/7-days-7-shoots-eos-5d-mkii/

Comment by indi
2008-12-04 12:22:03

I saw his Reverie video, totally nuts. That’s one of the main reasons I got the LX3, wanted HD video. The Canon is obviously leagues above cause the range of lenses and all

 
 
Comment by rajivmw
2008-12-04 09:19:02

I have an F31 and I’ve never loved a camera more. But when it comes time to move on, the LX3 seems like the best bet. It’s obviously a hot little number cos not even amazon has it in stock at the mo. Where did you get yours?

 
Comment by indi
2008-12-04 10:09:09

Not here, via Bangkok I think. There’s a Panasonic Lumix dealer here, but it’s weird how they never stock the money cameras

Comment by rajivmw
2008-12-05 12:27:17

Yeah, it’s not just the Lumix dealer though. Sri Lanka seems to be a dumping ground for cheap/outdated crud peddled by salespeople who know zilch about anything. It’s so hard to find any of the good stuff here, and when you do, chances are it’s ridiculously priced. The assumption seems to be that we’re all either paupers or morons. Which, thinking about it now, may not be that far from the truth.

 
 
2009-08-21 09:18:03

[...] ever made. I have owned two and thrashed them till they fell apart, but they’re magical. The LX3 I have now takes ‘better’ more printable photos but the controls suck and it makes a [...]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


The English Speaking Elite:
  • Mahinda: This is sort of a forum, isn't it? What I mean is that Indi posts something, everyone has a quick read, then starts using this space to air their own views and spread their own message or start their own little (quite often completely unrelated) arguments or whatever... Its got an organic quality, which I think is quite nice......
  • The way of the Dodo: I think we should take some of this stuff and create a forum. That allows for better discussion and more mature dialog. What do you guys think...
  • Mahinda: Just curious... Didn't mean to offend....
Much More Mahinda:
  • Mahinda: Lousy, uninteresting comeback with only mild entertainment value. Where's the wit? Where's the logic/justification to the comment? I'm disappointed in you......
  • David Blacker: Mahinda, I doubt you'd make a good bench press, never mind a press sec....
  • Mahinda: Machang Blacker! Where have you been??! Were you busy washing your hair or something? Oh sorry - you don't have hair, no? So why the offensive attitude? Don't you think I'd make a good press sec? ;)...
The Final Cross:
  • Mahinda: Flyovers, if effectively used, are an excellent method of improving the flow of traffic and congestion. Since you guys don't think the ones that have been built work terribly well towards that objective, lets just blame Mahinda and the Government for this and move on :) Ok. That was just a little joke, but on a serious note, I think development should be well thought out and also implemented in the most cost effective manner. Which...
  • Anon: To add to what Dodo say, before the fly-over there was stop-go traffic at the Dehiwala junction. After the flyover there is a continuous, but slow flow of traffic. Although I use that road only rarely in my limited experience the length of the queue and the time taken to travel is no better after the flyover, and may be slightly worse. Moving the bus stand would be an improvement at Dehiwala, think Nugegoda is somewhat more...
  • Anon: Thanks Shammi, there was a very good interview in the Nation a few years back that opened my eyes to him. Think he did a fair job at the port and according to reports did not take a large "grant" that was in the offing. Agree with Dodo that Mangala's chances of getting elected at the moment look pretty slip....

Related Posts


My Camera Recommendations (Low Light)

Low light is the holy grail of photography. The shot above, for example, was taken outside at 1:50 AM. This is only possible by keeping the camera still and shutter open for 20 seconds. The subjects have to sit still the whole time, like old timey photographs. It is also possible to use a high ISO setting (literally the same ISO standard for companies) to get greater sensitivity to light. That means you can keep

Night Photography: Still Life

This shutter thing has existed forever, but it still amazes me. I feel like I can see in the dark now. I actually close my eyes and see stuff in that ethereal photographic light sometimes. I'm thinking there's two ways to take photographs at night. One is to put more light on the sensor (over time, with the shutter) or to improve the sensitivity of the sensor so it records an image faster (ISO). I've

Night Photography: Haunted House

There's this haunted house down Skelton Road. When we're bored we occassionally break in there and scare ourselves. These shots are taken therein with a 15-30 second shutter. It was 1:30 in the morning and we could barely see ahead of ourselves, but the photos look like daylight. Some very strange, still daylight, but this LX3 lets in a lot of light. In the photo above, for example, you can see the blades and color

Double Long Exposure

This is a double exposure. The shutter is open for 20 seconds. For the first 10 the subject holds a pose. Then they jump and held another pose. In this case the subject got too ambitious and fell over so there are actually three exposures. This was at night, after the sun had set over the Kalutara hills. The light you see on the plants is not visible to the naked eye. All we saw

Ghosts In The Low Light

Playing with time, you can get people to appear in the dark if they just sit still. I'd never thought of it, but apparently you can make them appear twice if you get them to sit still twice. As in, hold still for 4 seconds, then hold another post for 4 seconds, and keep the shutter open the whole time. For this it's better to have the aperture at like 8 (rather than 2) to