Bomb Attack on President’s Brother

The bombed out cars downtown. Photo via Yahoo News


Just getting tenative reports, but a friend sent me a text at 10h40 saying, ‘Heard a big explosion from my house, then what sounded like gunfire. Maybe fire crackers who knows’. Didn’t think much of it, but then I got more reports that something was going on, and now the phone lines are clogged. He’s on 5th Lane and he seems to think the bomb was on Flower Road. Apparently it was on Dharmapala Mawatha and was an attempt on Gotabaya Rajapakse’s life. That would be another attack on Kollupitiya. That being the President’s brother and Defense Minister. Please leave comments if you know anything or hear anything on the radio. I’ll keep an eye on Jasmine to start, and LBO used to be pretty fast. ChaarMax reported it first. Hope you and yours are safe from harm.

From what I hear it was near Mondy’s on Dharmapala Mawatha. A lot of people I know take that route everyday. Kollupitiya is pretty much downtown Sri Lanka. If I’m hearing right, the bomb site is near the Mango Tree restaurant and Mondy’s clothing store. There’s also a bank and a shopping mall, and a lot of working people pass through there on their way to or from Galle Road. So, that would be a civilian area. Bad form.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

32 Comments »

2006-12-01 11:12:45

Great, was somewhere past Gangarama, towards the school I think.. smokes pretty much like the lat 2 bombings.. got pictures but they ain’t clear enough .Although the gunfire got louder n louder for a while. I want to know who shot who.Cos if it was a suicide bombing?? I hope no civilians got shot :( I’d hate to hear it.

 
Porcelain_Cat
2006-12-01 11:20:31

mate, do you know what’s going on? im at work and everyone is babbling in sinhala and i don’t know what’s happening. do you have any news?

 
David Blacker
2006-12-01 11:35:47

Explosion was at the Mango Tree intersection (Flower Road & Dharmapala). Looks like it was a 3-wheeler carrrying the bomb. One car was still burning at 10.45am. Jag limo behind burning car, but doubtful if that was target vehicle. Dismembered body at scene. NO shooting going on. Repeat, NO shooting.

 
Jack Point
2006-12-01 11:38:03

Gotabaya is safe but the army had apparently fired at bystanders – this is straight off the gossip line

 
2006-12-01 11:44:48

God my office is close to where the bomb went off. And all I know is that there was this loud blast and the entire building just shook and after that there was gun fire.

Some glasses in our office had cracked with the blast….

Never in my entire life have I been this close to where a bomb went off to experience the real shock wave and it really scared the shit out of me.

That just goes to show that in Sri Lanka with all this north east conflict going on we are not safe anywhere…..

 
2006-12-01 11:49:33

From Reuters,

Gothabaya Rajapakse, who was admitted to hospital, has taken a hard line against Tamil Tiger rebels since he was appointed a year ago. His driver said he was only slightly injured.

“This is the Secretary of Defence’s vehicle. He was taken away with slight injuries,” the driver said, standing next to the ash-coloured BMW with shattered windows. He refused to give his name.

The attack comes just days after the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) said they were resuming their independence struggle in what analysts said opened a new chapter in the island’s two-decade civil war.

A Reuters witness saw a severed head in the back of a pickup truck at the scene of the blast and the wreckage of a three wheeler taxi — vehicles which have been used in previous bomb attacks blamed on the rebels.

A severed head found at the roadside after blasts is also often the sign of a suicide bombing.

 
TahS
2006-12-01 11:55:08

Location is correct as per earlier reports. Gun fire lasted a 40secs, nothing more. i suspect this was the army guys around making sure the suicide bomber (if thats what it was) was dead – just in case the bomb didn’t do it. from the pictures on tv, there seems to be one dead on the back of a pick-up truck (could be the suicide bomber).

Everyone i know is safe. hope its the same for you’ll.

 
gihan
2006-12-01 15:30:25

Apparently the gunshots were a result of the guards firing into the air to make way for Gotabhaya to be taken directly to Nawaloka – where he was cleared of any injury. no shootout or gunbattle.

 
Jill
2006-12-01 16:44:01

I heard shots being fired right after the explosion. Soldiers in panic must’ve opened fire cause if its a suicide bombing there would not be any targets worth shooting at, hope no innocents were killed.

David Blacker
2006-12-01 17:51:19

No, sadly all the innocents managed to avoids the “panic”-stricken soldiers spraying indiscriminately into the huge crowds standing by and cheering (you see close protection details are hand picked for their panic value, and when not sufficiently panicky, special training is given to induce the right amount of panic). Another unfortunate thing was that the first thing a soldier thinks when he sees a dismembered terrorist on the ground is that he might as well use up all those spare 30-round mags that were gathering dust in the back of the Defender. And what better target than the teeming multitudes of innocents that always gather around in anticipation of a likely suicide bombing. There must have been literally hundreds of innocents massacred by those horrible naughty men in uniform.

 
 
Sripala
2006-12-01 17:36:10

Sorry to hear about the bomb blast that shook the capital, luckily our defence secretary has escaped, but we shouldn’t forget this is all due to hard line stand against the conflict. I feel more sorry for the peoplw in the North east who are not only being starved, but being bombed and children are being taken away by our troops too. This is just one bomb, but that is their daily life. I have heard worse things about people suffering in Jaffna from my cousin who was in the Sri lankan army. I feel ashamed to be a Srilankan Buddhist.

 
Jill
2006-12-01 18:39:50

Sri Lankan soldiers aren’t the best trained, so wouldn’t be surprised if they did shoot bystanders in panic. The past record of the army here doesn’t inspire much confidence (the same well-trained army that gunned down French aid workers, massacred innocent students who happened to be bystanders when a convoy hit a claymore).

ghostwriter
2006-12-01 19:33:15

As opposed to all the other people running around with guns and explosives who went to the best finishing schools.

 
David Blacker
2006-12-01 23:51:18

Yes, when there’s a ‘massacre’ or a dozen or so are ‘genocided’, it’s not because of panic. Try and be consistent in your ignorance. Funny how everyone starts talking about panicky soldiers instead of the terrorists who actually did kill innocent bystanders today. No one was shot today; many were blown to bits. Who’s panicking here?

 
 
Liz
2006-12-02 00:02:39

DB, you are knowledgeable and it’s another scary event, but what use is there in using such a snotty tone?

David Blacker
2006-12-02 00:13:04

Well, Liz, I find it annoying when people continue to persist with fantasies like the ‘panicky soldier’ theory even so late in the day, when it’s obvious to everyone looking at the pix or driving past the bombsite that there are no bullet holes anywhere around. There have been NO gunshot injuries reported. Why persist with this line of bias? These are elite well trained troops, not line infantry even. If you don’t like the military, just say so and move on. Don’t attempt to make up stories that have no basis of fact. I find it a bit repulsive that the only people to blame here seem to be the soldiers who didn’t kill anyone, and not the terrorists who just killed innocent bystanders because they bungled a suicide bombing.

 
 
Jill
2006-12-02 02:02:58

Gihan’s explanation sounds plausible. Shots were fired for a fact, Blacker seems to dispute that. One doesnt have to state the obvious that LTTE are ruthless murderers without a conscience. When the elite well trained troops can’t protect their own Army leadership it doesn’t say much of their procedures or training.

David Blacker
2006-12-02 10:05:41

I didn’t dispute the fact that shots were fired. Please read BEFORE typing. It’s the most basic of blog ettiquette to actually read the post you are attempting to respond to. I don’t think basic literacy is too much to ask for, is it? But to save you the trouble, Jill, let me repeat what I said. I said that there was no continuing ‘gun battle’, as some had claimed; there was no panicky shooting at by standers as others had assumed. It’s uite likely that shots were fired into the air to clear a path.

It’s quite telling, Jill, that you didn’t, in your first post, hope that too many innocent bystanders hadn’t been killed or injured by the bomb, but that instead you hoped that none were killed by the Army. Are there somehow two categories of ‘innocent bystander’?

Tariq
2006-12-02 12:38:23

2006-12-01 11:35:47
NO shooting going on. Repeat, NO shooting.

2006-12-02 10:05:41
I didn’t dispute the fact that shots were fired. Please read BEFORE typing.

Shouldn’t you follow blog etiquette before ranting…?

At the end of the day shots were fired.. but I completely agree that there is no way in hell these were from ‘panicky’ soldiers… those selected for this type of duty are selected from the elite.

My uncle is currently a very senior officer in the armoured co. but has trained both special forces and members from the presidential security division and the way he speaks of their professionalism and abilities leaves no room for doubt that ‘panic’ is something that they just don’t do… IF they were firing there would have been a damn good reason for it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
David Blacker
2006-12-03 11:26:05

Tariq, what’s the matter with you, do you need a lesson in present and past tense? I had posted that there was “no shooting” at 11.45am after having watched the 10.45am news coverage. There WAS NO SHOOTING AT THE TIME. What is unlear about this? Have I disputed anywhere that shots were fired? I have already said that shots were probably fired. Can I make it any clearer?

2006-12-03 13:56:03

Agree with D.B. His meaning was pretty clear from the start, and was a reaction to reports that there was shooting still going on. In fact, I put up a comment about that myself, based on the CNN report that a gun battle was going on. I think this comment preceded DB’s comment, but strangely the comment has disappeared, along with a few other comments of mine on the Prabhakaran’s post.

 
Tariq
2006-12-03 14:36:29

Apologies Blacker my mistake…

 
 
 
 
David Blacker
2006-12-02 10:12:10

Oh, and btw, the LTTE failed to get the Army leadership. Again. As they failed yesterday to get the Defence Sec. You seem vaguely frustrated by these failures, Jill, and your posts sound like you’re scrabbling to find some piece of dirt that might save the day and not make the LTTE look like they buggered up entirely. Yes, a few innocent bystanders shot by the Army would’ve been something the haters could’ve held up as a consolation prize. Sorry, didn’t happen. Better luck next time.

 
Tariq
2006-12-02 12:45:39

Are you for real Jill? if someone is willing to blow themselves up even the most layered security detail will be unable to stop an assassination attempt… in this case the fact that their ‘mark’ (i.e. The Def Sec) survived actually means that they did their job and did it damn well… these guys put their lives on the line every second of the day to protect someone elses and they should be respected for that…

 
ghostwriter
2006-12-02 15:58:21

If commentors like Jill hadn’t been around, I for one would have forgotten that the army actually spends its entire training budget on telling soldiers to panic and shoot indiscriminately whilst on a protection detail.

So, your problem was that shots were fired in the air in the aftermath of a suicide bombing? Perhaps you can type out a polite comment castigating the LTTE leadership for sending exploding Tigers into the streets of Colombo while you’re at it.

It seems that you really don’t know jack after all, Jill.

 
 
Jill who?
2006-12-02 06:54:56

“When the elite well trained troops can’t protect their own Army leadership it doesn’t say much of their procedures or training. ”

Jill….If terrorist’s we’re able to bring down the WTC, NYC….anything is possible. Considering that SL is a third world country, the “Elite soldiers” I would say, should be commended for protecting the defence sec.
And I don’t understand why everyone is talking about soldier’s firing their guns when you really should be blasting
the suicide bombers who are responsible. If not for them, there wouldn’t be any dead innocent bystanders.
Terrorist’s are cowards and should be eliminated.

 
Outsider
2006-12-02 08:05:05

Regarding comments from some of you ( Jill, Etc..))simply shows how naive some of you can be. It’s a simple fact that it is hard to stop suicide bombers. When they don’t have respect for their own lives, is it very simple to understand their morals and values.
So why criticize the people who at least are trying to do their job to protect our leaders.

As for Liz, I don’t think Blaker sounds snotty at all. He seems to understand the facts behind “these”, more than some of you guys out there.

 
Liz
2006-12-03 08:53:36

Right all, my bad if it sounds like I intended to excuse any of the shit the Tigers pull daily and decade-ly, or the danger that military personnel are in while doing their job and often doing it well (as in this case).

I do however stand by wishing for a de-sneering of online conversation, much good may it do me or any of us. We’ve got what’s basically telepathy on the page, go humanity!, but are letting the pissy, territorial reptile-brain speak. Wasteful.

David Blacker
2006-12-03 11:33:36

I’m generally never rude unless I intend to be, Liz. And if a comment is made out of ignorance, fine. But when certain comments are made with the calculation of pushing a particular agenda, I tend to lean towards scarcasm in my replies. I could, on the other hand, choose to be personally offensive by insulting the other posters family, ancestory, spouse, etc (as many do). Instead, I revert to sarcasm — snottiness if you will.

 
 
2006-12-05 01:33:53

[...] A blast in Colombo with the likely target being a Government Minister. More at Indi.ca who says “There’s also a bank and a shopping mall, and a lot of working people pass through there on their way to or from Galle Road. So, that would be a civilian area. Bad form.”. Neha Viswanathan [...]

 
2009-04-21 22:24:26

[...] plan, in hindsight, but it failed. The Foreign Minister (incidentally, a Tamil) was killed but the Defence Secretary and the Army Commander survived. Hence they’re [...]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

email indi AT indi.ca.


Recent Comments


Buying Appliances Online (Singer) (2)

cynical gal: and she washes your underwear???

cynical gal: you have a MAID????

Unequal Marriage In Sri Lanka (The Foreign Kind) (17)

Carasek: “Please fix the grammatical errors in the above.” Please fix the grammatical error in the above sentence.

Carasek: Hi Roshnee In your rush to kindness about the Immigration Department, I respectfully comment that you do not state a fully accurate position. I have also had repeat communications with the Immigration Department and have found them to be...

Chaminda: aaah but with a bit of something something under the table…. all options are open….

Sri Lanka To Offer Dual Citizenship Again (7)

N: No visa needed, you need to travel on your US passport and get the US passport endorsed saying you are a SL dual citizen.

Avengers: A Review (7)

Chathura Sandeepa (@chathuras): “They could’ve literally had the Avengers meetup at a coffeeshop.R 21; I like it! :D

General Sarath Fonseka Out Soon? (8)

David Blacker: Shammi’s right. US pressure has nothing to do with it. Jailing the opposition never looks good, no matter how many charges tou cook up. MR probably is realizing this. Also, note the upcoming elections in crucial areas.

Future Porn (3)

David Blacker: Well, if they brought in a hard-core element as was done in the old Caligula, it might have worked. As porn, Zack & Miri just wasn’t porn. Check out some of the European indie movies and you’ll find that element. I...

Dinuka: Check out Zack and Miri Make a Porno- this is about as close as humanity’ s ever going to get to an adorkable, quirky porno.

Miss Travel. Alternately, Mistravel

This is highly dubious. Miss Travel is a travel/social networking site that connects ‘Generous’ and ‘Attractive’ travelers. To, like, travel together, I guess. It all seems a bit like arranged prostitution and trafficking. This is part of a broader online trend to connect rich men to younger, attractive women. Sites like seekingarrangement.com connects women to ‘sugar daddies’ already. I guess Miss Travel is just taking that trend international. Wait, I checked, it’s the same guy doing both.

Buying Appliances Online (Singer)

Sri Lankan domestics never say anything, they just stop coming. My maid just stopped coming and when I finally pressed her she said I needed to get a washing machine. I was hoping to ride this one out, but I’ve run out of underwear and I have no choice. I finally caved and bought a washing machine, from Singer, ONLINE. I put the online in all caps because it’s pretty awesome. I ordered the thing in like 15 minutes on Saturday and they just delivered it today. It’s pretty awesome, this brave new world.

Future Porn

There’s nothing wrong with pornography, but there’s a lot wrong with porn. Nothing wrong with watching people have sex, but too often that sex is brutal, senseless and coerced. I mean how many couples are coming on each others faces every day? Hence, philosopher king Alain de Botton – after calling for a new atheism, replete with temple – is now calling for a new pornography. One which is “fit for thoughtful, good human beings”. Good idea.

Sri Lanka To Offer Dual Citizenship Again

Sri Lanka is going to start offer dual citizenship again, for people of Sri Lanka descent (ie, those who migrated or their kids). Which is good. Still not an actual immigration policy, but getting, well getting back to the status quo. I got dual citizenship years ago.